How is this possible/ what does it mean?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Edi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the implications of traveling faster than the speed of light (c) in the context of General Relativity. The user explores mathematical manipulations involving the equation for mass increase at relativistic speeds, specifically using Wolfram Alpha to demonstrate that raising terms to the fourth power can eliminate negative numbers. However, the conclusion emphasizes that these manipulations do not yield physically relevant results, as they involve imaginary numbers that do not correspond to real-world physics. The discussion highlights the distinction between mathematical operations and their physical interpretations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of relativistic mass
  • Basic knowledge of complex numbers and imaginary numbers
  • Proficiency in using mathematical tools like Wolfram Alpha
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of imaginary numbers in physics
  • Study the Lorentz transformation and its effects on mass and velocity
  • Explore advanced topics in General Relativity, particularly mass-energy equivalence
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students of theoretical physics who are interested in the nuances of relativistic physics and the mathematical interpretations of speed and mass. It is particularly relevant for those studying the limits of physical laws and the role of complex numbers in theoretical frameworks.

Edi
Messages
176
Reaction score
1
I am applying this to the General relativity .. stuff..
So, basically this [ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2/+sqrt(1-+400000000^2/300000000^2)) ] equation shows that it is pretty impossible to fly faster than the speed of light in vacuum, because the you have to deal with sqrt of negative numbers and that's just bad. Ok, fine. What else is new?

Oh, i know! This!: what if I take everything in the equation to the power of 4? Like this: [ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2^4/+sqrt(1-+400000000^2/300000000^2)^4) ]
of course, the result is in power of 4 too, but! - there is no negative numbers and problems!

This is a equation for mass increase while traveling at velocity near (faster? ) the speed of light in vacuum (c).
starting mass is 2(kg)
The resulting mass from traveling at 1.33 (?) c is ~26.45^1/4 .. well.. this : [ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(2^4/+sqrt(1-+400000000^2/300000000^2)^4)^1/4 ]


Flying faster than c? No problem! ... except that there is a problem! :( - at least form my, not-that-much-educated, point of view.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're just performing some mathematical manipulations that don't have any physical relevance. In particular, you're raising an imaginary number to the fourth power and taking the 4th root to get a real number. What you perhaps don't know is that when you take the nth root of a number, there are actually n solutions.

For example, take the number i. You know i^4 = 1. However, 1^(1/4) has four solutions: +1, -1, +i, -i.

So, at speeds faster than c you get an imaginary answer for \gamma m_0, but taking that to the fourth power and then taking the fourth root does not give you a physical answer that's real. The correct root is still the imaginary root you started with.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
893
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K