How Is Thouless Pronounced in the Context of the Nobel Prize Announcement?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the announcement of the Nobel Prize in Physics awarded to David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane, and J. Michael Kosterlitz for their theoretical discoveries related to topological phase transitions and topological phases of matter. Participants explore the implications of this award, the significance of the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition, and the context of recent advancements in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note the surprise of the award, suggesting that the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition was previously overlooked for a Nobel Prize.
  • Others discuss the relevance of recent work on topological insulators and Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) as factors in the timing of the award.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about how to explain the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition at a popular science level, indicating a need for accessible explanations.
  • There are mentions of the ongoing anticipation for a Nobel Prize related to gravitational waves, with some participants speculating on the nomination process and the committee's considerations.
  • Some participants express opinions on other physicists they believe are deserving of a Nobel Prize, such as Lene Hau and Vera Rubin.
  • Questions arise regarding the terminology of "gap" and "gapless" in the context of spin chains, indicating a need for clarification on these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the significance of the Nobel Prize winners and the implications of their work. There is no consensus on the explanations for the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition or the future of gravitational wave research in relation to the Nobel Prize.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of explaining advanced topics in theoretical physics to a general audience, indicating that the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition does not fit neatly into traditional symmetry-breaking phase transition frameworks.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to physicists, educators, and students seeking to understand the implications of the Nobel Prize in Physics, particularly in the context of topological phases of matter and the challenges of communicating complex scientific concepts.

  • #31
isnt topology just pure maths?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Joel94 said:
isnt topology just pure maths?
See the second link in post #4.
 
  • #33
Joel94 said:
isnt topology just pure maths?

What does that even mean?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #34
atyy said:
Barry Barish! But I'd be delighted if Rainer Weiss won since I showed him how to align an experiment :p

BTW, how does one pronounce "Thouless"?

Does it rhyme with "toe", or with "thou" meaning "you" in old English?
I orginally thought that the answer @vanhees71 gave was correct, but It just occurred to me today that there are a couple of different "th" sounds. The "th" in "thought" and "thaw" is slightly different from the "th" in "those" and "thou". The "th" in "Thouless" is pronounced like the "th" in "thought" and "thaw".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
14K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K