How Is Work Related to Changes in Kinetic Energy in a Rocket Car's Deceleration?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between work and changes in kinetic energy in the context of a rocket car's deceleration. The original poster presents a scenario where a rocket car slows down after deploying a parachute, involving calculations related to work done and mass determination.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate mass using work and changes in kinetic energy, expressing confusion over discrepancies in their results compared to expected values. Some participants question the calculations related to velocity conversions and the application of the work-energy principle.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations, offering suggestions to recheck specific values and clarifying the correct application of formulas. There is a recognition of potential mistakes in the original poster's approach, particularly regarding the treatment of velocities and the sign of work.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the correct units for velocity and the implications of using km/h versus m/s in calculations. The original poster's confusion about the mass calculation and the teacher's feedback on the correctness of the formula but not the calculations are also noted.

mousemouse123
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A rocket car is traveling at 648km/h[f] when the parachute is deployed and does 51.64MJ of work to slow the car down to a speed of 54.o km/h



Homework Equations



w = delta ek
w= m(1/2mvf^2 - 1/2mvi^2)
m= w/0.5(Vf^2-Vi^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



i derived that equation from w=delta kinetic energy and i got 2/3 for showing work... this was a test question 4 months ago

now i have an exam tomorrow.

the mass i got is 248kg. the teacher took it up and the correct mass was 3210kg. i honestly feel my answer is correct and i constantly repeat this question and get 248 kg!

he said my formula is correct just the calculation is wrong

this is what i did.

51.64x10^6J/ -208494(negative since Vi > Vf so you get negative mass but i guess you ignore the negative)

can anyone tell me what i am doing wrong?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Recheck your value for v02 - vf2.
 
If the velocities were 648 m/s and 54 m/s, the answer would be 248 kg.

Let 1 km/h = c m/s

m = 2w / (v_1^2 - v_2^2)
= 2 * 51.64 * 10^6 / (648^2 c^2 - 54^2 c^2)
~= 248 / c^2

This formula only works for velocities in m/s, we see.
 
vertigo said:
If the velocities were 648 m/s and 54 m/s, the answer would be 248 kg.

Let 1 km/h = c m/s

m = 2w / (v_1^2 - v_2^2)
= 2 * 51.64 * 10^6 / (648^2 c^2 - 54^2 c^2)
~= 248 / c^2

This formula only works for velocities in m/s, we see.


i am no expert in physics but i think you made mistake. shouldn't it be 54^2-648^2 not the way you wrote it since it is slowing down. you subtracted v initial from v final... the formula is v final minus vinitial
 
mousemouse123 said:
i am no expert in physics but i think you made mistake. shouldn't it be 54^2-648^2 not the way you wrote it since it is slowing down. you subtracted v initial from v final... the formula is v final minus vinitial

w = \Delta E_k = (1/2) m (v_f^2 - v_i^2)

I should have made the work negative because the change of energy was negative, energy was lost. So I made two changes to the formula, I neglected to make the work value negative, but I also wrote the velocities back to front. I could do that for this formula because it made no difference.

You can see that because:

\frac{2w}{v_f^2 - v_i^2} = \frac{2(-w)}{v_i^2 - v_f^2}.

So I actually used the second part of that, because I used -w (by using 51MJ and not -51MJ). Admittedly, I should have used -51 MJ and done it the correct way round, just to be safe.

I only did it because I could do it without making the answer invalid. But as you saw, what I could not do was use km/h values for the velocities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K