How long does an electron need to absorb energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter crocodillo555
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the time required for an electron to absorb energy equal to its work function of 0.3 eV when exposed to light at a rate of 5x W per square meter. A participant initially calculated the time as 96 seconds, while the correct answer is 16 minutes, indicating a discrepancy by a factor of 10. The forum members concluded that the work function value may have been incorrectly stated and should possibly be 3.0 eV instead of 0.3 eV, which would affect the calculations significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the photoelectric effect
  • Familiarity with work function concepts in physics
  • Basic knowledge of energy absorption calculations
  • Proficiency in unit conversions (seconds to minutes)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of the photoelectric effect and its implications
  • Study energy absorption rates in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the significance of work function in electron emission
  • Explore common errors in physics calculations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and the photoelectric effect, as well as educators looking for examples of common calculation errors in energy absorption scenarios.

crocodillo555
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Light falling on a metallic surface of work function 0.3 eV gives energy to the surface at a rate of 5x
6edf763703b89d98480ec50f62ab6b47.png
W per square metre of the metal's surface. Assume that an electron on the metal's surface can absorb energy from the area of about 1x[PLAIN]http://www.matematyka.pl/latexrender/pictures/e/b/eb7bbf435df9523928fb3157689f9fcf.png.
How long will it take the electron to absorb an amount of energy equal to the work function?

I've tried to do this exercise but my result is 96 s while it should b 16 min.
I'd be thankful if anyone could help :xx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to PF! As a newcomer, please note that we ask that you always use the template for submitting questions. This includes showing some detail of your calculation.

Your answer looks correct to me based on the numbers given. The answer of 16 min differs from your answer by a factor of 10. A work function of 0.3 eV seems very small to me. I wonder if it should have been stated as 3.0 eV.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: crocodillo555
Thank you very much for your answer. :) Apparently there is mistake in data given in the exercise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K