MHB How Long for 61Co to Reduce to 80% of Its Initial Value?

CaptainBlack
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Jimson asks over on Yahoo Answers

I've got some A2 physics homework and unfortunately i can't seem to do the first question :

The question is: 61Co has a half life of 100 minutes. how long will it take for the radioactive isotope to reduce to 80% of the initial value?

The answer is 32 minutes, but of course i'll need the workings before it to actually prove i can do the question.

Thank you for any help given! (if any is anyway).


The key idea is that after 100 minutes 1/2 remains after 200 minutes 1/4 remains so the fraction remaining after \(t\) minutes is:

\[Q=2^{-t/100}\]

So if \(80\%\) remains we need to solve:

\[0.8=2^{-t/100}\]

which we do by taking logs (the base is unimportant as long as we use the sane base throughout):

\[\log(0.8)= -\; \frac{t}{100} \log(2)\]

So:

\[t=- \; \frac{\log(0.8)}{\log(2)} \times 100\]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So since this thread is almost 10 years old, it is safe to provide the numerical answer, $$t=-\frac{100\log(0.8)}{\log(2)}=32~\text{min.}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top