How Long to Reach the Top Walking on a Moving Escalator?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a person to reach the top of a 20.0m escalator while walking at a speed of 0.500 m/s relative to the escalator, which moves at 0.400 m/s. The total effective speed of the person is the sum of their walking speed and the escalator's speed, resulting in a combined speed of 0.900 m/s. Consequently, the time taken to reach the top is calculated using the formula V = d / t, yielding a time of approximately 22.2 seconds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relative motion concepts
  • Familiarity with basic physics equations, particularly V = d / t
  • Knowledge of speed and velocity definitions
  • Ability to perform basic arithmetic calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study relative motion principles in physics
  • Learn about vector addition in motion scenarios
  • Explore real-world applications of speed and velocity calculations
  • Practice problems involving moving platforms and relative speeds
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching motion concepts, and anyone interested in understanding relative motion and speed calculations.

optoracko
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An escalator is 20.0m long. If a person stands on the escalator, it takes 50.0s to ride from bottom to the top.

a) if a person walks up the moving escalator with a speed of 0.500 m/s relative to the escalator how long does it take for the person to get to the top.

Homework Equations



V = d / t

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not understanding relative motion too well. I begin by calculating the velocity of the escalator which is 0.400 m/s. Since the person is walking up with a speed of 0.500 m/s in relation to the escalator, does that mean that if the escalator was not there, he'd be walking at 0.500 m/s? Why would I not add the two velocities (.4 + .5) and isolate for the time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
optoracko said:
I begin by calculating the velocity of the escalator which is 0.400 m/s.
Correct.
Since the person is walking up with a speed of 0.500 m/s in relation to the escalator, does that mean that if the escalator was not there, he'd be walking at 0.500 m/s?
It is better to think of this way: It means that if the escalator were not moving, he'd be walking at 0.500 m/s.
Why would I not add the two velocities (.4 + .5) and isolate for the time?
Why do you think you should not do that?
 
Not quite sure. I guess I thought that if it was moving relative, it would mean that it moves that speed and the speed of the elevator. Blech.

Would that mean that anything with relative motion requires something to be stationary, such as in this question?
 
optoracko said:
Would that mean that anything with relative motion requires something to be stationary, such as in this question?
All motion is relative. You may think that you are at rest sitting in front of your computer reading this message, but
relative to the center of the Earth you are moving at about 1,000 miles an hour
relative to the Sun you are moving much faster
relative to a galaxy far far away much much faster.

Get the picture?
 
Yeah, makes sense now. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
27
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K