How Long to Slide Down an Icy Slope When Losing Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karnten07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a 5.4 kg toboggan carrying 35 kg of sand to slide down a 90 m slope inclined at 30 degrees, while losing mass at a rate of 2.3 kg/s. Participants clarify that the leaking sand does not affect the toboggan's acceleration, which remains constant at 0.5g due to gravitational forces. The key equation used for determining the time is s = 0.5at², where 's' is the distance, 'a' is the acceleration, and 't' is the time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the conservation of momentum in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations
  • Basic knowledge of conservation of momentum
  • Concept of variable mass systems in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the equation s = 0.5at² in kinematics
  • Learn about variable mass systems and their implications in dynamics
  • Explore the concept of momentum conservation in different physical scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of friction on motion and how it alters acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on dynamics and kinematics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to motion with variable mass systems.

karnten07
Messages
206
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a 5.4kg toboggan carrying 35kg of sand slides from rest down an icy 90m slope inclined at 30 degrees below the horizontal. The sand leaks from the back of the toboggan at a rate of 2.3kgsec^-1. How long does it take the toboggan to reach the bottom of the slope?

Homework Equations


previous equations involved rockets and the equation:

v(final) = v(initial) + u ln(mi/mf)
where u is the exhaust speed

not sure if this relates to this question though?



The Attempt at a Solution



I drew the situation but can't see how to find the time, any suggestions please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems like a trick question. Is the sand just leaking out? or is it thrust out with a velocity relative to the toboggan? if it is just leaking then it has exactly the same velocity the moment it is leaked, as when it was still in the tobaggan...

so by conservation of momentum... the toboggan's velocity doesn't change when the sand is released... it is just like if you're traveling in a toboggan horizontally... and you start dropping objects to the ground... you won't speed up...

also although gravity and normal force change because of the decreased mass... the acceleration doesn't...

If it is just leaking out, then it won't affect the speed of the toboggan... it's just a purely kinematics problem... the 2.3kgs^-1 is unnecessary information.

Hope I'm not misunderstanding the question...
 
learningphysics said:
Seems like a trick question. Is the sand just leaking out? or is it thrust out with a velocity relative to the toboggan? if it is just leaking then it has exactly the same velocity the moment it is leaked, as when it was still in the tobaggan...

so by conservation of momentum... the toboggan's velocity doesn't change when the sand is released... it is just like if you're traveling in a toboggan horizontally... and you start dropping objects to the ground... you won't speed up...

also although gravity and normal force change because of the decreased mass... the acceleration doesn't...

If it is just leaking out, then it won't affect the speed of the toboggan... it's just a purely kinematics problem... the 2.3kgs^-1 is unnecessary information.

Hope I'm not misunderstanding the question...

I think youre right because the lesson coordinator said something about it not changing, but i wasnt paying full attention. SO if acceleration remains constant could i just use the equation of motion s = 0.5at^2 ?
 
karnten07 said:
I think youre right because the lesson coordinator said something about it not changing, but i wasnt paying full attention. SO if acceleration remains constant could i just use the equation of motion s = 0.5at^2 ?

yes. be careful about the a... what is the acceleration here?
 
learningphysics said:
yes. be careful about the a... what is the acceleration here?

ah yes you're right, is it 0.5 g because when you resolve the force of mg downwards, you get a force of 0.5mg down the slope. So by f = ma the acceleration = 0.5 g. Yay, thankyou so much, i had it all here in my notes but it just took a little prodding to understand it lol :approve:
 
karnten07 said:
learningphysics said:
yes. be careful about the a... what is the acceleration here?

ah yes you're right, is it 0.5 g because when you resolve the force of mg downwards, you get a force of 0.5mg down the slope. So by f = ma the acceleration = 0.5 g. Yay, thankyou so much, i had it all here in my notes but it just took a little prodding to understand it lol :approve:

yup. that's it.
 
learningphysics said:
karnten07 said:
yup. that's it.

This one worries me. Since mass is variable shouldn't we be using F=dp/dt? Physically the picture is that the escaping mass, even though it has no relative velocity, is not being accelerated, whereas the rest of the toboggan is. I'd say more, but I'm having trouble solving the resulting ODE.
 
Dick said:
learningphysics said:
This one worries me. Since mass is variable shouldn't we be using F=dp/dt? Physically the picture is that the escaping mass, even though it has no relative velocity, is not being accelerated, whereas the rest of the toboggan is. I'd say more, but I'm having trouble solving the resulting ODE.

When the mass is leaked... the momentum of the toboggan without the mass of the leaked sand doesn't change... I see it the same way as if you were traveling horizontally and dropping things out of a cart...
 
Dick said:
Ok, when you are dropping things out of a cart, the thing you are dropping is exerting a dragging force on you because you are accelerating. When you drop it, that force disappears. This is, in effect, a net thrust forward. This is fun, though it's giving me a headache! I still can't solve the ODE though.

but that's only in the case of friction right? this is frictionless...
 
  • #10
You are right, of course. That's complete nonsense. How can something accelerate faster than g by passively falling apart? Nothing like one last great good idea before going to bed... Sorry.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K