How many living cells on Earth?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the estimation of living cells on Earth, with a current count of approximately 1030 cells and a projected total of about 1041 cells throughout Earth's lifespan, as reported in a NY Times article. Dr. Crockford's research emphasizes that planetary productivity, influenced by available energy sources, limits the number of life forms. The article highlights the evolution of energy usage in biological systems, noting that increased energy resources have historically supported the proliferation of cells.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ecological productivity and energy sources
  • Familiarity with biological evolution and energy transformations
  • Knowledge of microbial diversity in extreme environments
  • Basic concepts of geochemical energy sources
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of energy availability on ecological systems
  • Explore the role of microbial life in extreme environments
  • Study the historical evolution of energy usage in living organisms
  • Investigate the relationship between planetary productivity and biodiversity
USEFUL FOR

Ecologists, evolutionary biologists, environmental scientists, and anyone interested in understanding the scale of life on Earth and its energy dynamics.

BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
2,727
Reaction score
11,934
A NY Times article "Exactly How Much Life is on Earth?" (research article here, behind a paywall) says that there are about 1030 cells currently on earth and the total numbers of cells that will be on earth through its future lifespan is about 1041 cells.

That is:
more living cells on Earth — a million trillion trillion, or 10^30 in math notation, a 1 followed by 30 zeros — than there are stars in the universe or grains of sand on our planet

But for now, Dr. Crockford and his colleagues wrote in their paper, “the extension of today’s relatively high rates of primary productivity will likely squeeze more life into less time.”
It was implied in the article that overall planetary productivity is limited by the energy sources available to the life forms. This is an ecological argument.
This amounts to how much energy (sunlight or chemical) is available for life forms to use at different geological times. The earliest life forms may only have had geochemical energy from H2 and CO2 in special locations to use for their purposes. Eventually other chemical sources were made available for use as well as sunlight. These greater energy resources allowed more cells to be made and supported with energy sources.

There was an article a few years ago on changes in biological energy usage through evolution:
The Energy Expansions of Evolution by Olivia Judson(also paywalled).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: syfry, Greg Bernhardt, jim mcnamara and 1 other person
Biology news on Phys.org
Truly remarkable! One may scoff until you consider the number of microbes in the deepest seas, highest atmosphere, and deep crust.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K