How many cycles of time should be measured for the most accurate T?

  • Thread starter merrypark3
  • Start date
  • #1
30
0

Homework Statement



Measuring the period of a sine wave using oscilloscope, for the best accuracy, is it better to measure only one cycle?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let [itex]t=T_{1}+T_{2}+\cdots + T_{n}[/itex] (Measuring n cycle)

From error propagation formula,
[itex]\delta t = \sqrt{(T_{1})^2+(T_{2})^2+\cdots + (T_{n})^2}[/itex] (or [itex]\delta t= n \delta T_{1} [/itex] ???)


but as [itex] T_{1}, T_{2}, \cdots , T_{n}[/itex] are independent so the value of each [itex]\delta T_{n} [/itex] is same. So, let [itex] \delta T= \delta T_{1} = \delta T_{2}= \cdots = \delta T_{n} [/itex]

This [itex] \delta T [/itex] is a error for a period.

Therefore,

[itex] \delta t= \sqrt{n(\delta T)^{2}}=\sqrt{n} \delta T[/itex]

But, [itex] \delta t \propto n[/itex] (as n increases, the scale for one div the screen become smaller,
which increase your error)

So [itex] \delta t = \sqrt{n} \delta T \propto n [/itex]

So, [itex] \delta T \propto \sqrt{n} [/itex]


Therefore, measuring the least number of cycle is best

Is it correct?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
Borek
Mentor
28,545
2,982
Common logic tells me measuring once length of several cycles should yield a better result (as the measurement error is effectively divided by the number of cycles, which in an exact number).

Caveat: if the cycles are not identical, this way you will lose the information about variability (variance).
 
  • #4
6,054
391
Measuring multiple cycles gives better accuracy if your clock is accurate. If the clock itself is drifting, then it is a nasty question. I think we need more context here.
 

Related Threads on How many cycles of time should be measured for the most accurate T?

Replies
1
Views
539
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Top