MHB How Many Polarizing Sheets Are Needed to Rotate Light 90 Degrees?

bberns
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question: We want to rotate the direction of polarization of a beam of light through 90 degrees by sending the beam through one or more polarizing sheets. (a) What is the minimum number of sheets required? (b) What is the minimum number of sheets required if the transmitted intensity is to be more than 60% of the original intensity?

Relevant Equations: I(n)=I(0)*(cos(90/n))^(2n)

I have had this problem explained to me once before but have had trouble following the logic of the problem and understanding how the direction of the light changes when moving through a polarizing sheet. Any and all help is greatly appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
bberns said:
Question: We want to rotate the direction of polarization of a beam of light through 90 degrees by sending the beam through one or more polarizing sheets. (a) What is the minimum number of sheets required? (b) What is the minimum number of sheets required if the transmitted intensity is to be more than 60% of the original intensity?

Relevant Equations: I(n)=I(0)*(cos(90/n))^(2n)

I have had this problem explained to me once before but have had trouble following the logic of the problem and understanding how the direction of the light changes when moving through a polarizing sheet. Any and all help is greatly appreciated!

Hi bberns! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

When polarized light enters a polarization filter that is at an angle of 90 degrees, no light can get through.
However, if the filter is at an angle of, say, 45 degrees, the amplitude is reduced by a factor of $\cos(45^\circ) = \frac 12 \sqrt 2$.
Since the intensity is related to the square of the amplitude, the intensity is reduced by a factor of $(\cos(45^\circ))^2 = \frac 12$, after which the process can be repeated to ultimately be left with a non-zero intensity at 90 degrees.

The formula shows how much intensity remains after $n$ filters that are at an angle of $90/n$ degrees with respect to each other.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top