MHB How many possibly unique entries are there in a symmetric tensor?

ssh
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Show that a symmetric tensor has n(n+1) \ 2 quantities.

In a symmetric tensor we have that Aij = Aji which means that
A12 = A21

A23 = A32 and so on. Thus these n quantites are similar. What do we do next?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A symmetric tensor must, by definition, be square. Hence, you have a situation like the following:
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
a_{11} &a_{21} &\dots &a_{n1}\\
a_{21} &a_{22} &\dots &a_{n2}\\
\vdots &\vdots &\ddots &\vdots\\
a_{n1} &a_{n2} &\dots &a_{nn}.
\end{bmatrix}
$$
So the possibly unique entries are all the ones on the main diagonal plus all the ones either above the main diagonal, or all the ones below the main diagonal. So to find out how many there are, let's say you take all the entries on and below the main diagonal. How many in the first row? $1$. How many in the second? $2$. And so on. So the number of possibly unique entries is
$$1+2+\dots+n=\sum_{j=1}^{n}j=\frac{n(n+1)}{2},$$
by a well-known formula.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top