How measureable parameters associate with operators

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between measurable parameters and operators in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on how mathematical forms of operators, such as position and momentum, are derived from wave functions and eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how the mathematical forms of operators are constructed and the implications of these forms in relation to eigenvalues and wave functions. Questions arise about the validity and meaning of different projections of eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the mathematical foundations of operators and their associations with physical quantities, while others have suggested further research to refine the original poster's question. The discussion remains open with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific conditions for valid eigenfunctions and observables, as well as the importance of probability density in quantum mechanics. Participants also mention the need for normalization of outcomes in the context of probability.

enricfemi
Messages
195
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


in quantum mechanics, if we have a wave function, and an operator, we
can know the eigenvalue from the eigen equation:[tex]\hat{F}[/tex][tex]\phi[/tex]=f[tex]\phi[/tex]. but how we obtain the mathematical form of operator [tex]\hat{F}[/tex]?

Homework Equations



[tex]\hat{x}[/tex] [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] x ?
[tex]\hat{p}[/tex] [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] -ih [tex]\partial[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]x ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what you are doing. I mean, mathematically what you are doing is projecting a vector (your eigenvector) onto the space you want to. You can do just about any projection you want, the question is whether it will mean anything. I can go into more depth if you'd like, but I have a feeling that doing some research first will help you take your general question to something more specific.
 
Mindscrape said:
It depends on what you are doing. I mean, mathematically what you are doing is projecting a vector (your eigenvector) onto the space you want to. You can do just about any projection you want, the question is whether it will mean anything. I can go into more depth if you'd like, but I have a feeling that doing some research first will help you take your general question to something more specific.

thanks Mindscrape!
to be specific, my question is how the following associations are constructed:
[tex]\hat{x}[/tex] [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] x ?
[tex]\hat{p}[/tex] [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] -ih [tex]\partial[/tex]/[tex]\partial[/tex]x ?
 
I'm not quite sure of your math level, so let me just tell you how it works in the way I know. If I don't answer your questions completely I suggest you see if you can find one of these books:

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths
Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications by Zettili (sp.?)
Principles of Quantum Mechanics by Shankar

So, as you may or may not know, there are some conditions that have to apply to valid eigenfunctions
Square Integrable [tex]\int |f(x)|^2 dx < \inf[/tex]
and observables
Hermitian [tex]\langle f|\hat{A} g \rangle = \langle \hat{A} f| g \rangle[/tex]

So basically where we figure out the position operator is by probability. We want to use that operator to figure out where the most likely spot the wavefunction will be appear. We also know that from probability that all the outcomes have to add up to 1, there just can't be greater than 100% chance of things happening (it's our way of 'normalizing' outcomes). So there must be some probability density that describes all the probabilities and that has to add to 1.
[tex]1=\int \rho(x) dx[/tex]
In discrete mathematics if we wanted an average we would do
[tex]\langle x \rangle = \frac{\sum{j N(j)}}{N} = \sum(j P(j))[/tex]
It translates in such a way that
[tex]\langle j \rangle = \int j \rho (j) dj[/tex]
or
[tex]\langle x \rangle = \int x \rho(x) dx[/tex]
and so really the probability density [itex]\rho[/itex] is related to the wavefunction, or also called the eigenfunction, in the way I mentioned earlier
[tex]1 = \int |\psi(x)|^2 dx[/tex]
put it all together
[tex]\langle x \rangle = \int x |\psi(x)|^2 dx[/tex]
which is to say that this gives us the most probable location the wavefunction will collapse to.
In full notation it would be (sometimes people leave the hat off)
\langle \psi | hat{x} \psi \rangle = \int x |\psi(x)|^2 dx


For momentum, let's just relate it back to classical mechanics
[tex]p=\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]
just the same in quantum mechanics
[tex]\hat{p} = \frac{d \langle x \rangle}{dt}[/tex]
using some integration by parts and Schrödinger's equation we eventually see
[tex]\hat{p} = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/tex]

Cool?
 
sorry to be late. it is really cool!
thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K