How much extra weight is needed for a 15lb 2x4 to withstand a 67mph drop test?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Moose720
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drop Test Weight
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the additional weight needed for a 15lb wood 2x4 to achieve a velocity of 67 mph during a drop test. The key formula used is the momentum equation, p = m*v, which leads to the conclusion that an additional weight of approximately 32.5 lbs is required to reach the desired momentum. The velocity of a free-falling object from a height of 10 feet is calculated to be 21.19 mph using the formula v = sqrt(2*g*d). The discussion also emphasizes that adding weight does not increase the fall speed until air resistance becomes significant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly momentum and free fall.
  • Familiarity with the formula for velocity of a free-falling object: v = sqrt(2*g*d).
  • Knowledge of momentum calculation: p = m*v.
  • Basic grasp of gravitational acceleration (32.2 ft/s²).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of air resistance on falling objects and how it impacts momentum.
  • Explore methods for simulating high-speed impacts, such as using a spring-loaded mechanism.
  • Investigate safety protocols for conducting high-speed drop tests.
  • Learn about the differences in impact dynamics based on the orientation of the object (end vs. side impact).
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineers, physicists, and hobbyists involved in impact testing, material science, or those designing experiments related to momentum and free fall dynamics.

Moose720
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am needing a project to withstand the impact of a 15lb wood 2x4 traveling at 67mph in a horizontal fashion. I want to test my project before the final test. I want to vertically drop a 15lb wood 2x4 fixed to additional weight at a height of 10ft. The additional weight will be released just before the impact of the 15lb 2x4. How much additional weight is needed to be added to the 2x4 to achieve the 67 mph just before impact? Also what formulas are used to get this answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moose720 said:
I am needing a project to withstand the impact of a 15lb wood 2x4 traveling at 67mph in a horizontal fashion. I want to test my project before the final test. I want to vertically drop a 15lb wood 2x4 fixed to additional weight at a height of 10ft. The additional weight will be released just before the impact of the 15lb 2x4. How much additional weight is needed to be added to the 2x4 to achieve the 67 mph just before impact? Also what formulas are used to get this answer?

Remember that ignoring air resistance, different weights fall at the same acceleration (1g). So adding weight to your 2x4 will not make it fall any faster, at least not until it reaches a speed where wind resistance comes into play (which it will not from 10 feet).

So you need some sort of 2x4 accelerator, like a slingshot or other stored energy mechanism. Maybe some sort of big rubber band setup...
 
Or find a private road someplace where you can get permission to drive...
 
So if i drop 1000lbs and 1 lb from the same height, they will land at the same time?
 
And wouldn't the additional weight be a stored engergy?
 
Moose720 said:
So if i drop 1000lbs and 1 lb from the same height, they will land at the same time?

Yep. That's the classic leaning tower of Pizza thing. Or whichever astronaut on the moon dropping a feather and something thing.

Moose720 said:
And wouldn't the additional weight be a stored engergy?

Weight lifted against a gravitational field is stored potential energy, true. But that will not give you additional acceleration above 1g.

The private road is your best bet in the short term, IMO. As long as you can set up the experiment safely.
 
Does anyone have any other ideas how I can simulate this test other than the private road idea. Something a little more controlled.
 
How is the final test going to be conducted? Do they have a machine to launch the 2x4?
 
Rather than a drop or road test why not use a spring loaded and/or rotating arm?

Incidentally it makes a heap of difference whether the 4x2 impacts end or sideways on, ie acting in a piercing or clubbing mode.

go well
 
  • #10
Moose, you don't need to have a slingshot and speed up the test at all. The main factor in all of this is momentum. I posted the following in your other thread, but I thought that I'd post it here as well.

This is how I would go about it:

1. Figure out how fast the object is moving when dropped from 15 feet. This can be done with the known acceleration due to gravity (32.2 ft/s^2). This is the average acceleration across the Earth's surface. If you wanted a more accurate number, you'd have to factor in your elevation. This won't be necessary or matter for this purpose, unless you're at the summit of Mt. Everest or something. Anyway, the formula for the velocity of a free-falling object on Earth given a certain height is as follows:
v = sqrt(2*g*d)
v = sqrt (2 * 32.2 ft/s^2 * 15 ft)
v = 31.08 ft/s = 21.19 mph

2. Given the velocity of the object in your experiment, the desired velocity, and the desired weight, you can set up an equation of momentum. The main principle here is that you desire a momentum produced by a 15 lb object going 67 mph. Momentum is equal to the product of mass and velocity (p = m*v). Since you're looking to recreate the momentum from the desired experiment and you cannot change the velocity, you have to add mass. That gives you the following equation:
m1v1 = m2v2
(15 lb)*(67 mph) = (X lb)*(21.19 mph)
X = 47.43 lbs

3. So, for your experiment to produce the required momentum, your total weight needs to be 47.43 ~ 47.5 pounds. You currently have a 15 lb mass so therefore, you need to add an extra 32.5 lbs of mass to your weight.

4. Just as a note, there are some inaccuracies in this experiment. The calculations I made were using point-masses, not actual objects. The difference is not very large at all and will be negligable in what you're trying to accomplish. I would not worry about those. I figure that if air resistance isn't necessary, then it isn't necessary to dive into the center of mass/inertia values for the mass.

Hope this helps!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
11K