How much mass does it take before photons will have a stable orbit?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of photons and their potential to have stable orbits around massive objects. Participants explore hypothetical scenarios involving large masses, including black holes and solid spheres, and the implications for light behavior in such gravitational fields. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects of gravity, photon behavior, and the conditions required for stable orbits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a hypothetical situation where an extremely large mass could allow light to orbit, questioning the visual and physical implications of such an arrangement.
  • Another participant references the concept of a "photon sphere" and suggests that black holes can achieve this orbiting behavior due to their gravitational properties.
  • It is noted that photons, being bosons, can exist in the same state without interacting significantly, which may imply a lack of limit to the number of photons in orbit.
  • A participant raises the idea of a solid sphere of lead with a mass similar to a black hole, questioning its stability and whether it would collapse under its own gravity.
  • Another contribution asserts that any massive object with sufficient gravitational potential would behave similarly to a black hole, indicating that light would not have a stable orbit if it were within a certain radius.
  • A technical point is made regarding the critical radius for stable photon orbits, referencing specific calculations related to mass and gravitational effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of massive objects and their ability to support stable photon orbits. While some agree that black holes provide a model for this behavior, others question the stability of non-black hole massive objects and their gravitational effects. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the nature of mass and gravity in these scenarios, as well as the definitions of stability and orbit in the context of light. The discussion involves complex theoretical considerations that are not fully resolved.

smorningstar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is my first post so I hope I'm putting it in the right section :redface:
I searched for similar questions but could not find one.

Edington preformed his experiment where he observed the bending of light around the sun due to gravity.
I have been thinking this past weekend about a hypothetical situation.

What would happen if we had an extremely large mass and tried putting light into its orbit?
A spaceship can orbit the Earth with the right speed and altitude. So why can't we do this with light? (besides for it being non-practical in size.) If so what would it look like. Would it look different, Would we be able to add more photons to it? Is there a limit to how much it can hold, similar to are atmosphere and the amount of satelites that can be placed in it. What would happen with any light escaping from the mass?
What are your thoughts?

Many thanks,
smorningstar
 
Science news on Phys.org
We already have something that can do this, a black hole, assuming that it's gravity potential is appropriately symmetric. Photons are bosons, multiple photons can exist in the same state. Not that orbiting photons could really be classified as a simple quantum state, we can extend the idea to that photons do not interact with each other very much. So I do not see that much of a limit to how many photons you pack into an orbit. Unlike an object with mass, they will not bump into each other nor will they generate their own gravity field (as far as I know) that will affect the entire system.
 
Thank you, now I understand it a little better.
However from what i read a black hole is always increasing its size up until a certain point. What if it was not a black hole that pulled everything in but was just a giant solid sphere of lead with a mass similar to a black hole? However the difference is one would be much more stable.

Or would it have such a high mass that it would collapse on itself?

Thanks:smile:
 
Well, regardless of whatever it is, it is going to end up essentially being a black hole. The gravitational potential is going to be 1/r and light will always travel at a speed of c. If you have a strong enough gravitational potential at some radius R to give light a stable orbit, then obviously any radius less than R will be strong enough to pull light into the gravity well. If you have any kind of sphere of density and mass high enough to be similar to a black hole, then I doubt it is going to behave any differently from a true black hole.
 
The critical radius for an object of mass is considered to be r0=9M/4 (or 2.25M) where M=Gm/c2, which puts the radius inside the photon sphere (3M), based on this, some neutron stars on the brink of collapse are considered to have photon spheres (though based on the densities involved, they might be quark stars).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
609
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
17K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K