How much work is done by friction during the car's slide down the hill?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 320 kg car sliding down a 500 m long and 300 m high hillside, with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.23. The questions focus on calculating the gravitational potential energy at the top of the hill and determining the mechanical energy lost due to friction during the slide.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of potential energy using the formula PE = mgh and explore the implications of friction on energy loss. There are questions about the correct application of the work-energy theorem and the definitions of work and energy.

Discussion Status

Several participants have attempted calculations for potential energy and work done by friction, with varying results. Some have provided guidance on the correct approach to calculating frictional forces and the angle of the incline, while others express confusion about the application of the work-energy theorem. There is no explicit consensus on the correct values or methods yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There are ongoing discussions about the assumptions made regarding the incline and the calculations involved.

fatty1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 320 kg car slides from rest down a hillside that is 500 m long and 300 m high. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the car and the hill surface is 0.23.

1) If the gravitational potential energy PE of the car-Earth system is set to zero at the bottom of the hill, what is the value of PE just before the slide?

2) How much mechanical energy is wasted by frictional forces during the slide?




Homework Equations



PE = mgh

Frictional force = (kinetic friction) * (mg cos theta)

Work = Final Energy - Initial Energy



The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to solve the first question with the potential energy equation but I am having trouble solving the second equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fatty1 said:
I tried to solve the first question with the potential energy equation but I am having trouble solving the second equation.
I assume you can treat the hillside as if it were a straight incline.

What's the force of friction? You have the formula. What's the angle of the incline?

Use that friction force to calculate the work done by friction.
 
Doc Al said:
I assume you can treat the hillside as if it were a straight incline.

What's the force of friction? You have the formula. What's the angle of the incline?

Use that friction force to calculate the work done by friction.



I did it this way.

1) PE = mgh = 320 x 9.8 x 300 = 940800 J

2) By work energy theorem:
=>W = Delta Energy
=>Delta Energy = kinetic friction * distance
=>Delta Energy = 0.23 * 320 * 9.8 * [300/500] * 500
=>Delta Energy = 216384 J


I did it this way, but for question 2, should the answer be negative since it loses energy?
 
fatty1 said:
I did it this way.

1) PE = mgh = 320 x 9.8 x 300 = 940800 J
Perfectly correct.

2) By work energy theorem:
=>W = Delta Energy
=>Delta Energy = kinetic friction * distance
=>Delta Energy = 0.23 * 320 * 9.8 * [300/500] * 500
=>Delta Energy = 216384 J
You're using the definition of work-- work=force*displacement--not the work-energy theorem. You've made an error: 300/500 is the sine of the angle, not the cosine.

I did it this way, but for question 2, should the answer be negative since it loses energy?
The work done by friction is negative, since the force and the displacement are in opposite directions. But the amount of energy 'wasted' would be positive.
 
potential energy just before the slide(at top of hill)= mgh= 320*10*300

let me give you some help with the second question. If the energy were not to be lost then the whole of the potential energy would have converted into kinetic energy and velocity at the bottom would have been v=sqrt(2gh) .but in this case the velocity will be less than this calculated velocity and this is where the energy is lost.

So at first calculate the acceleration down the hill of the car.

ma= mgsinA -(Coeff of friction, U)*mgcosA , I am using A in place of theta
a=4.16 m/s^2 if you put g=10m/s^2

Now velocity at the bottom is given by
v^2=2*a*S(hypotenuse distance of the hill)
v=64.5 m/s

therefore K.E at bottom =665600 J
Loss is energy = P.E at top - K.E at bottom
 
2)
=>W = Delta Energy
=>Delta Energy = kinetic friction * distance
=>Delta Energy = 0.23 * 320 * 9.8 * [500/300] * 500
=>Delta Energy = 601067 J

I reversed that and got this value. If it is not correct, then can you explain much clearer about the work energy theorem?
 
fatty1 said:
2)
=>W = Delta Energy
=>Delta Energy = kinetic friction * distance
=>Delta Energy = 0.23 * 320 * 9.8 * [500/300] * 500
=>Delta Energy = 601067 J

I reversed that and got this value. If it is not correct, then can you explain much clearer about the work energy theorem?
Again, this is not the work-energy theorem. You are just using the definition of work.

You still made an error in calculating the friction force, which should be μmg*cosθ. Before you had sinθ, instead of cosθ; now you have 1/sinθ, which is still not correct. Hint: In the right triangle formed by the hill, the hypotenuse is 500, the side opposite the angle is 300, so what's the third side?

FYI, the work-energy theorem states that the net work done on a body will equal its change in energy. We don't need to use that here. You could use it, but doing it the way you are attempting to do it is better and quicker. You just need to get the correct value for cosθ. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
18K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K