How popular is PCTRAN in the industry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter koab1mjr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Industry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the popularity and utility of PCTRAN as a tool for reactor analysis in the nuclear engineering field. Participants explore its applications, compare it with other software, and seek resources for learning the program.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the widespread use of PCTRAN and requests a user manual for self-study, indicating an academic interest.
  • Another participant mentions that AREVA uses RELAP for coupled Point-Reactor Kinetics to Thermal-Hydraulics analysis, suggesting that PCTRAN may not be as widely adopted in the industry.
  • This participant also notes that PCTRAN seems more suited for operators or managers, while highlighting the need for coding changes in VB for engineering alterations, which may limit its appeal to nuclear engineers.
  • A third participant reiterates the initial inquiry about PCTRAN's usage and suggests contacting Micro-simulation Technology for manuals and additional resources.
  • A later reply indicates a decision to focus on RELAP5 and mentions that the school has acquired multiple programs, including TRACE, RELAP5, and PCTRAN, but expresses uncertainty about which is best for nuclear engineering applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the utility of PCTRAN, with some suggesting it may not be the best tool for nuclear engineering compared to others like RELAP5. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall popularity and effectiveness of PCTRAN.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the effectiveness of PCTRAN versus other reactor analysis tools, and there are references to specific programming requirements that may affect its usability.

koab1mjr
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
is it a widely used tool for reactor analysis. And does anyone know of where I can find a usermanual? I am looking to teach myself since my school is buying the program and I will have to setup a ssimple simulation by the end of the semester.

Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have personally not used it, but I know that AREVA uses RELAP for their coupled Point-Reactor Kinetics to Thermal-Hydraulics analysis.

Just from quick inspection on their website, PCTRAN appears to be more useful to operators or managers. Any engineering alterations to the model itself (e.g. the NSSS) would require coding changes via VB, which is a rather niche language given the dominance of FORTRAN in the industry.

In short, I wouldn't consider this a useful reactor analysis tool for the nuclear engineer. Look into lattice codes.
 
koab1mjr said:
is it a widely used tool for reactor analysis. And does anyone know of where I can find a usermanual? I am looking to teach myself since my school is buying the program and I will have to setup a ssimple simulation by the end of the semester.

Thanks in advance
Why not contact Micro-simulation Technology with a request.
http://www.microsimtech.com/

Industry projects
http://www.microsimtech.com/pctran/page6.htm
 
OK thanks for the replies, I will put my emphasis in RELAP5, the school bought a whole bunch of programs such as TRACE, RELAP5 and PCTRAN, i wasn't sure which one was the best for nuclear engineering type work and simulation.

I will email and ask for manuals as well.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K