How scientists calculated the weight of Mars

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Scientists calculated the weight of Mars to be 6.39 × 1023 kg using Newton's law of gravity. The mass of Mars can be determined from the observed orbits of its moons, Phobos and Deimos, which allows for calculations based on centripetal acceleration. The technique is applicable for other celestial bodies, such as the Sun, where the mass is inferred from the Earth's orbit. Accuracy in these calculations decreases as the mass of the orbiting object approaches that of the planet being measured.

PREREQUISITES
  • Newton's law of gravity
  • Centripetal acceleration concepts
  • Orbital mechanics
  • Basic mathematical skills for calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the calculation of planetary mass using Newton's law of gravity
  • Investigate the orbital mechanics of Phobos and Deimos
  • Learn about the methods for calculating the mass of celestial bodies without orbiting objects
  • Study the effects of mass on orbital accuracy in gravitational calculations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, educators, and students interested in celestial mechanics and gravitational calculations.

Electrical
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
How scientists calculated the weight of Mars to be 6.39 × 10^23 kg?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you google for "calculate the mass of a planet" you'll find how this is done fairly quickly. I strongly suggest that you actually try the calculation - it is way more fun than just looking up the final answer.

If you do the math (just start with Newton's law of gravity) you'll find that the behavior of an orbiting object depends on the mass of the the object being orbited but not the mass of the orbiting object. This allows us to calculate the mass of Mars from the observed orbit of its moons, just as we canculate the mass of the sun from what we know of the Earth's orbit.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Also, the amount how much a focal point of the elliptical orbit of Mars around Sun deviates from the centerpoint of Sun could be one quantity that can be checked for consistency (after estimating the mass of Mars from the centripetal acceleration of Phobos and Deimos).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes sophiecentaur, vanhees71 and hutchphd
hilbert2 said:
Also, the amount how much a focal point of the elliptical orbit of Mars around Sun deviates from the centerpoint of Sun could be one quantity that can be checked for consistency (after estimating the mass of Mars from the centripetal acceleration of Phobos and Deimos).
Yes, good point, and that technique is essential when we don't have a convenient orbiting body - as is the case when we're trying to determine the mass of Earth's moon.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Nugatory said:
If you google for "calculate the mass of a planet" you'll find how this is done fairly quickly. I strongly suggest that you actually try the calculation - it is way more fun than just looking up the final answer.

If you do the math (just start with Newton's law of gravity) you'll find that the behavior of an orbiting object depends on the mass of the the object being orbited but not the mass of the orbiting object. This allows us to calculate the mass of Mars from the observed orbit of its moons, just as we canculate the mass of the sun from what we know of the Earth's orbit.
Well, not exactly. As long as the mass of the orbiting object is very small compared to the planet, you get a fairly accurate answer. But as the mass of the orbiting body increases, it becomes less accurate. For example, if you were to calculate the Earth's mass from just the Moon's orbital period and distance while ignoring the Moon's mass vs. doing so while accounting for the Moon's mass, you would get answers that differ by about 1%
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, sophiecentaur and Nugatory

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
12K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K