How should a non-cellular metal organism maintain homeostasis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Krunchyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal Organism
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the conceptualization of a fictional species called the Replicators, which are bipedal, anaerobic, autotrophic beings made entirely of metal alloys. They lack DNA and cellular structures, relying instead on mechanical components for their physiology. The Replicators reproduce by hand-assembling new individuals over hundreds of years, utilizing petroleum lakes on their carbon-rich planet to maintain their mechanical joints. Key challenges include their energy metabolism and the implications of their non-cellular nature on survival and reproduction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of anaerobic and autotrophic processes
  • Familiarity with mechanical systems and materials science
  • Knowledge of evolutionary biology concepts
  • Insight into digital information storage and processing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of artificial life and Von Neumann machines
  • Explore the implications of non-cellular life forms in astrobiology
  • Investigate energy conversion processes in mechanical systems
  • Study the concept of evolutionary programming in artificial intelligence
USEFUL FOR

Science fiction writers, biologists interested in synthetic life, mechanical engineers, and anyone exploring the intersection of technology and biology.

Krunchyman
Messages
35
Reaction score
15
So, I'm drafting out a science fiction being. It's a bipedal, anaerobic, autotrophic sentient being that is almost entirely mechanical and it has no DNA or cellular structure - instead, it's physiology is a maze of gears and metal mechanisms (although they do store information somewhat digitally) almost all the way down to the microscopic level.

They're made completely of various metal alloys and they live on a planet made of carbon. Petroleum lakes cover 70 percent of the planet's surface and they use it to maintain smooth joints. The surface of the planet is covered in various metal alloys. The atmosphere is rich in various gasses, some of which are flammable.

The beings have only one purpose - to create others of their kind. Because they have no cellular structure - no way of physically reproducing - they opt for a different option, assembling others by hand. It can take hundreds of years but in the end, the gain is greater because the beings have no natural predators. Not only this, but each being adds new function to its creation, thus sustaining a form of artificial evolution, you might say.

The main issue I have in designing the species is its metabolism. How do they gain energy? Metal cogs and gears that make up an entire organism would surely require a steady and powerful source of energy. My first thought was that the surface of the beings planet was covered in thick layers of powerful gas (such as nitrogen) that they would absorb to maintain homeostasis. There are two issues that I can think of. First, the beings need an almost constant source of fuel and gas vapors could be sparse in some areas and overly thick in others. I came up with a temporary solution to this – the planet has no wind so gas is evenly distributed throughout its surface. The flip side is that an area wherever a being has been is a “dead zone” because the being has used up some of the gas there and it lacks enough gas to maintain any other life forms.

Second, how would the being use the fuel? I originally imagined that it would absorb the gas through porous holes and then turn it into energy from controlled combustion processes (similar to cellular metabolism). There might be problems with this as well. For example, would the organism damage any of its components during the process? If a cellular organism was to kill itself due to an accident, it could easily be replaced. But when a non-cellular organism has thousands of irreplaceable parts, a single accident could prove to be fatal.

So, what are your thoughts? Is it an organism that could live with a little faith? I'm open to criticism.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The beings have only one purpose - to create others of their kind. Because they have no cellular structure - no way of physically reproducing - they opt for a different option, assembling others by hand. It can take hundreds of years but in the end, the gain is greater because the beings have no natural predators

1. I don't get it - how does that guarantee they have no natural predators? Or, how does that take advantage of the fact that they have no predators?

2. If they have no DNA or other genetic material, why would they want to reproduce? What's the evolutionary or other drive for them to work hard and create progeny?
 
I've decided to call the beings the Replicators.

Mooky said:
1. I don't get it - how does that guarantee they have no natural predators? Or, how does that take advantage of the fact that they have no predators?

They have no predators so they only die after their parts wear out and become unusable. It takes about one lifetime to create a new Replicator so the ratio is an accurate 1:1 ratio.

By the way, I falsely stated that they had no natural predators. Instead, I should have said that they have no predators altogether. It would probably make more sense for me to make them have predators so they have a stronger will to reproduce and survive.

Mooky said:
2. If they have no DNA or other genetic material, why would they want to reproduce? What's the evolutionary or other drive for them to work hard and create progeny?

I haven't thought about that yet much, but their minds are digital so it's quite possible for that information to be programmed into them. That would suggest that some other being, a creator of some sort, programmed the information into them. I'm assuming that happened because it's impossible for non-cellular life to evolve in such a manner.

The Replicators are basically just intricate Von Neumann machines whose only purpose is to create others of their kind and heighten their physical evolution.
 
I take it these are artificial machines? There's no way a set up like this could evolve. A few thoughts;
  • How to they replicate? You say assemble by hand but how to they build new components?
  • How do they self repair?
  • What allows them to think and plan?
  • Where and how is information stored and accessed?
Considering the huge complexity of natural organisms I don't see how an organism made out of simple cogs could ever act like an animal. You say they are anaerobic and autotrophic but both of these involve the synthesis and use of organic molecules.

Edit: Also;
  • A planet made from carbon that has metals on the surface?
  • Where did the oil come from if it wasn't produced by organic life?
  • Why does this planet not have wind? How is nitrogen (an inert gas) powerful fuel?
  • What stops the machines from just using up all the fuel?
 
Last edited:
Krunchyman said:
The Replicators are basically just intricate Von Neumann machines whose only purpose is to create others of their kind and heighten their physical evolution.

I'm sorry, but that doesn't really make much sense. What does heighten their physical evolution mean, and why would it be so? Living beings don't live in order to evolve, and individuals don't evolve; populations do. And evolution is never a purpose.

I also second all of ryan_m_b´s points. I think you have a nucleus of an idea here, but it seems that your knowledge lies in CS, not in biology. You have to elucidate many of the evolutionary details, as well as create a convincing genesis story for your world and for your Replicators.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K