How should I simplify this product expression?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying a product expression involving terms indexed by n, where participants explore the behavior of the expression for both even and odd values of n. The subject area includes algebraic manipulation and factorials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share various attempts to express the product in simpler forms, questioning how to handle odd and even cases differently. Some suggest writing out terms to identify patterns, while others discuss the potential for using factorials in the simplification process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the structure of the product and how certain terms may cancel out. There is a recognition of the need to prove any observed patterns, and some participants have provided guidance on rewriting the product for clarity.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the denominator's simplification and the implications of different approaches to analyzing the product. There is also mention of homework constraints that may affect the discussion.

musicgold
Messages
303
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
I need to simplify the following product expression and show it in factorial terms.
Relevant Equations
As shown below I have calculated the value of bn for 10 terms.
1569876566334.png

1569877136336.png


I see that when n is an even number, the product can be represented as ## \frac {2n} {(n+1)} ##. When n is an odd number, the denominator seems to be changing and I am not able to define an expression for it.

How should I go about solving this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equality also seems to hold for odd n:

##b_3 = 2.3/(3+1) = 6/4 = 3/4##
##b_5 = 2.5/(5+1) = 10/6 = 5/3##

and so on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
Math_QED said:
The equality also seems to hold for odd n:

##b_3 = 2.3/(3+1) = 6/4 = 3/4##
##b_5 = 2.5/(5+1) = 10/6 = 5/3##

and so on.

Oh..I totally missed it. Thanks.
How would a trained mathematician go about analyzing this kind of question? Would they do what I did - analyzing a first few steps?
 
Math_QED said:
The equality also seems to hold for odd n:

##b_3 = 2.3/(3+1) = 6/4 = 3/4##
6/4 = 3/2
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
musicgold said:
How would a trained mathematician go about analyzing this kind of question?
Write a few of the terms. If I start with ##P_4## (the product of the first three factors), I get
##\frac 4 3 \frac 9 8 \frac {16}{15} = \frac{2^23^34^2}{3\cdot8\cdot15}##
The numerator can already be expressed in terms of factorials, but I don't think the denominator can.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
Mark44 said:
Write a few of the terms. If I start with ##P_4## (the product of the first three factors), I get
##\frac 4 3 \frac 9 8 \frac {16}{15} = \frac{2^23^34^2}{3\cdot8\cdot15}##
The numerator can already be expressed in terms of factorials, but I don't think the denominator can.
Yes, the denominator can ... well almost.

Factor the denominator. ##(k-1)(k+1)##Write out a few terms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
musicgold said:
Oh..I totally missed it. Thanks.
How would a trained mathematician go about analyzing this kind of question? Would they do what I did - analyzing a first few steps?
There are many factors that cancel numerator and denominator. I would write down some factors and see what cancels and what is left. Probably a lot cancels and if you are lucky, all you would be left with are at the beginning and the end.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
I would do it the way you did, and hope I saw a pattern. Of course, one then has to prove this pattern is correct. For this, you can use induction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold
if we take 3 successive terms we ll have
$$\frac{(k-1)(k-1)}{(k-2)k}\frac{kk}{(k-1)(k+1)}\frac{(k+1)(k+1)}{k(k+2)}$$ and after simplifications we are left with the two terms in the edges ##\frac{k-1}{k-2}## and ##\frac{k+1}{k+2}## which will get simplified by the previous and next terms so the total product will have all intermediate terms simplified to 1 and only the two outer-outer terms will survive which are the terms ##\frac{2}{1}## and ##\frac{n}{n+1}## giving the final solution $$\frac{2n}{n+1}$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold and FactChecker
  • #10
SammyS said:
Yes, the denominator can [be written as factorials] ... well almost.

Factor the denominator. ##(k-1)(k+1)##

Write out a few terms.
Supposing you are interested in solving this with factorials, you might find it helpful to do the following prior to writing out a few terms.

Rewrite the product as follows.

##\displaystyle b_n = \prod_{k=2}^n {\ \dfrac{k^2}{k^2-1}} ##

## = \dfrac{\displaystyle \left( \prod_{k=2}^n k \right) \left( \prod_{k=2}^n k \right) }{\displaystyle \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k-1) \right) \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k+1) \right) } ##​

Write out a few terms, or do the general expanded expression using ellipses (...) .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and FactChecker
  • #11
SammyS said:
Supposing you are interested in solving this with factorials, you might find it helpful to do the following prior to writing out a few terms.

Rewrite the product as follows.

##\displaystyle b_n = \prod_{k=2}^n {\ \dfrac{k^2}{k^2-1}} ##

## = \dfrac{\displaystyle \left( \prod_{k=2}^n k \right) \left( \prod_{k=2}^n k \right) }{\displaystyle \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k-1) \right) \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k+1) \right) } ##​

Write out a few terms, or do the general expanded expression using ellipses (...) .

Cool!

So if I understand this correctly, all terms except ## \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k+1) \right) ## can be converted into factorials, because the lowest term of that product will be 3. Is that correct?
 
  • #12
musicgold said:
Cool!

So if I understand this correctly, all terms except ## \left( \prod_{k=2}^n (k+1) \right) ## can be converted into factorials, because the lowest term of that product will be 3. Is that correct?
That can be converted to factorial too, it is equal to ##(n+1)!/2##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: musicgold and SammyS
  • #13
Delta2 said:
That can be converted to factorial too, it is equal to ##(n+1)!/2##
Great! Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K