How Should Impulse Be Applied to a Rod to Make It Land Upright?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saketh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Spinning
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the impulse J required to make an upright rod of mass m and length L land vertically after being given an impulse at a 45-degree angle. The correct impulse is derived as J = m√(gLnπ/3). The participants explore the relationship between linear and angular motion, using equations for time of flight, angular velocity, and angular impulse. Key calculations involve the center of mass trajectory and the conditions for the rod to complete a full rotation before landing upright.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and impulse
  • Familiarity with projectile motion equations
  • Knowledge of physical pendulum dynamics
  • Basic grasp of torque and its effects on rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between linear velocity and angular velocity in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about the principles of angular impulse and its application in mechanics
  • Explore the derivation of time of flight for projectiles under gravity
  • Investigate the dynamics of physical pendulums and their motion equations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotational motion and impulse application in mechanics.

Saketh
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
Problem: An upright rod of mass m and length L is given an impulse J at its base, 45 degrees above the horizontal, which sends the rod flying. What value should J have for the rod to land vertically again (i.e. upright on the same end at which J was applied)?
I'm trying to learn from Feynman's Tips on Physics, so I tried to follow his methods.

First, I thought about it without calculating. If the impulse were applied vertically, then it doesn't matter what its value is - the rod will always land on the same end. If the impulse were applied horizontally, then no impulse would be enough to make the rod land on the same end. Also, the center of mass must move in a parabola throughout the flight.

Armed with this thought process, I moved on to calculations.
J = mv
I know what m is, so I set that aside.
v_{y}=\frac{J}{m\sqrt{2}}<br /> t_{in flight}=\frac{2v}{g}
I found the time that the rod spends in the air.
\Delta\theta = 4\pi = \omega t
This is how much the rod has to spin.
v = \omega\frac{L}{2}
I tried using the rotation equation relating linear and angular motion, but something felt fishy about doing this.

Then I tried using a physical pendulum equation:
\omega = \sqrt{\frac{mg\frac{L}{2}}{\frac{ML^{2}}{12}}
Then I realized I was going nowhere at this point. I am stumped as to what method I am supposed to use. What is the relationship between the initial horizontal velocity and 4\pi? That's what I'm looking for right now.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One rotation gives \Delta\theta = 2\pi = \omega t, so why would one use \Delta\theta = 4\pi?
 
Astronuc said:
One rotation gives \Delta\theta = 2\pi = \omega t, so why would one use \Delta\theta = 4\pi?
I meant to write 2n\pi[/tex], where n is an integer, but 4\pi works as well. <br /> <br /> I thought that if you apply a strong enough impulse, then the rod would flip over many times and land on the same end. So 4\pi works, but 2n\pi is a general way of saying it. <br /> <br /> But I still do not understand how I should go about solving for velocity.
 
Interesting problem!

Find the vertical impulse on the stick and use that to find the time it spends in the air. (I think you did this.)

Then find the angular impulse on the stick and use it to find its angular speed (\omega) about its center of mass.

Combine these to meet your \theta = 2n\pi criteria and solve for J.
 
Wait - what is angular impulse? Is it m\omega?

I figured that the initial velocity in the x-direction is the same as the initial velocity in the y-direction. So I made v = \frac{\omega L}{2}, as I stated earlier.

I already found the time it spends in the air - if v_{y}=\frac{J}{m\sqrt{2}} and t_{in flight}=\frac{2v}{g}, then t_{in flight}=\frac{2(\frac{J}{m\sqrt{2})}{g}.

Then \omega t_{in flight} = 2n\pi. If \omega = \frac{2v}{L}, then I have the final proposition:
\frac{2v}{L}t_{in flight}=\frac{2(\frac{J}{m\sqrt{2}})}{g} = 2n\pi.

Is my work correct?
 
Last edited:
Angular impulse (\tau\cdot t) is equal to the chnage in angular momentum;

\tau \cdot t = I\Delta\omega

So as the rod starts from rest, the angulae frequency is given by;

\omega = \frac{\tau\cdot t}{I}

Where \tau is the torque. Do you follow?
 
If I wrap up the loose ends of my work in my previous post, then I get:
(\frac{2v}{L})(\frac{2v}{g})=2n\pi

Solving for v, this becomes:
\frac{4v^{2}}{gL}=2n\pi
4v^{2}=2gLn\pi
v^{2}=\frac{gLn\pi}{2}
v = \sqrt{\frac{gLn\pi}{2}}

Then, plugging back into J = mv, I get my answer (the wrong answer, though): J = m\sqrt{\frac{gLn\pi}{2}}.

The correct answer is J = m\sqrt{\frac{gLn\pi}{3}} - I am so close, yet so far!

If I were to use angular impulse, then \Delta t = \frac{2(\frac{J}{m\sqrt{2}})}{g}, I = \frac{mL^{2}}{48}, right? But then what would be the torque? Don't the gravitational torques cancel each other out?
 
Last edited:
You would use angular impulse to find your angular velocity as Doc Al said. So in this case applying an impulse of J at the base of the rod, leads to an angular velocity of;

\omega = \frac{L\cdot J\cos45}{2I} = \frac{L\dot J\cos45}{2\left( \frac{1}{12}ML^{2} \right)}

\omega = \frac{6J\cos45}{ML} = \frac{6J\sqrt{2}}{2ML} = \boxed{\frac{3J\sqrt{2}}{ML}}

This gives you radians per second. The next step would be to calculate the vertical time of flight (I'm not sure if you have done this already).
 
Last edited:
I made stupid math errors. I have the answer now.

\omega = \frac{3J\sqrt{2}}{mL}

\Delta t = \frac{v\sqrt{2}}{g}

\omega \Delta t = 2n\pi

Plugging in, I get J = m\sqrt{\frac{gLn\pi}{3}}.

I had everything right conceptually, but I made simple arithmetic mistakes. Thanks to everyone so much for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K