How sure we know the distance is x?

  • Thread starter jwxie
  • Start date
In summary, the author explains that the tension in the strings and the acceleration of the masses are related by calculating the distance the masses have moved.
  • #1
jwxie
281
0

Homework Statement



Please look at this pdf
http://iweb.tntech.edu/murdock/books/v1chap4.pdf

PDF pg. 18 - 22
Question# 14
14. Mass m1 on a frictionless horizontal table is connected to mass m2 through
a massless pulley P1 and a massless fixed pulley P2 as shown in Fig. 4.13. (a)
If a1 and a2 are the magnitudes of the accelerations of m1 and m2 respectively,
what is the relationship between these accelerations? Find expressions for (b)
the tensions in the strings and (c) the accelerations a1 and a2 in terms of m1, m2
and g.

Homework Equations



Fnet = ma
v = d/t
d^2 x / dt^2 = a
and so on

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand the solution he gives. Please turn to PDF page 20

The author says (first paragraph)
clearly the position of m2 is also measured by x. ` is the length of string from m1 to the pulley. xblock

Now I don't understand how sure we know it is x. Why can't it be X + 2, or X + 1500??

Later he says total length of the string is L, so it assumes that the entire system is actually running with one single string?? The given did not say that, and the diagram did not show that either.
In solving this problem, what do we have to think first? it seems very insightful that one sees the relationship in distance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The position of the mass m2 is also measured by x as the distance moved by the block m2 is same as the pulley.Of course the absolute distance differs but the change is the same.

And the length of the string is a constant. I don't see your point about running with a single string. They are clearly talking of the left string.
 
  • #3
aim1732 said:
The position of the mass m2 is also measured by x as the distance moved by the block m2 is same as the pulley.Of course the absolute distance differs but the change is the same.

And the length of the string is a constant. I don't see your point about running with a single string. They are clearly talking of the left string.

How does this system works?
You see, with one single pulley, i know that m1 and m2 will travel the same distance, one moves forward and one moves downard

now, back to this problem. how does this system works? I see a second string connected from P1 to pulley P2.

So when m1 moves, what happen to the second string, how does it respond?
 
  • #4
You may be aware that such problems are studied under Constraint motion. Here the only constraint is that the string is inextensible.
It is often possible to see the constraint from the diagram itself. Here the mass m2 moves x so p2 moves x. But you see the string is wrapped round the pulley o both sides so that its length would seem to increase by 2x. Since the string can not actually increase in length it will compensate by moving the block m1 by 2x.You see the wall to which p1 is attached can not move.

But these are elementary ways. A trained eye is a must for such questions. If you are familiar with rotational mechanics, this is an interesting application of Chasle's Theorem for general motion. The upper part of p1 in contact with the string is always at rest in same way as the bottom of a rolling ball is. Then velocity of the bottom point is 2v.You get the same result.
 

1. How do we determine the distance between two objects in space?

The distance between two objects in space can be determined using various methods such as parallax, radar ranging, and redshift. Parallax involves measuring the apparent shift in position of an object when viewed from different locations. Radar ranging uses radio waves to calculate the distance between objects. Redshift is a phenomenon in which the light from an object appears to have a longer wavelength due to its motion away from us, and this can be used to determine the object's distance.

2. What is the most accurate method for measuring distances in space?

The most accurate method for measuring distances in space is parallax. This is because it allows for direct measurement rather than relying on indirect measurements like redshift or radar ranging. However, parallax is only useful for objects within a certain distance from Earth, so for objects further away, other methods may be used.

3. Can we be certain about the accuracy of distance measurements in space?

Yes, we can be certain about the accuracy of distance measurements in space. Scientists use multiple methods and advanced technology to measure distances, and these methods have been tested and refined over time. However, there is always a margin of error in any measurement, so the accuracy may not be 100%.

4. How do we know that our distance measurements in space are not affected by factors like gravity or light bending?

Scientists take into account the effects of gravity and light bending when making distance measurements in space. They use advanced mathematical models and make corrections to account for these factors. Additionally, using multiple methods for measuring distances helps to reduce the impact of these factors on the accuracy of the measurements.

5. Are there any limitations to our understanding of distances in space?

Yes, there are limitations to our understanding of distances in space. Some objects are simply too far away for us to accurately measure their distance using current technology. In addition, the expansion of the universe and the movement of objects within it can also make it challenging to accurately measure distances. Scientists continue to research and develop new methods and technology to improve our understanding of distances in space.

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
793
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
3
Replies
97
Views
13K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top