How to append functions to a list of functions?

[RicardoMP]

My objective is to make a list of functions and afterwards be able to make operations with those functions.

  Hyfield[list_, bits_] := Module[{i, auxList, Hy},
      auxList[a_] := List[];
      For[i = 1, i <= bits*2, i++,
       auxList[a] =
        Append[auxList[a],
         c1*ArcCos[(list[a][[i]].list[a][[i + 1]])/(Norm[list[a][[i]]]*
              Norm[list[a][[i + 1]]])]]
       ];
      Return[auxList[a]]
      ]

In the above code, I receive a list of functions like this one:

bits2[a_] := List[
   {(w + a), -d},
   {-a, -d},
   {-(w + a), -(t + d)},
   {-a, -(t + d)},
   {-a, -d},
   {(w - a), -d},
   {-a, -(t + d)},
   {(w - a), -(t + d)}
   ];

These are vectors which I'll want to use to build other functions using dot product and norms. However, while testing this, I wanted to make sure that variable a is always a variable of these functions, so I can, for example, plot my functions later. If I use, for example,

    Hyfield[bits2, 2]

The function returns the list of the functions I appended.
However, if I return auxList[1], for example, (or any other number), I get

  {}

How can I keep adding (appending) my functions to the list and still be able to use variable a? Basically, can I still use my list of functions as a function of variable a, after appending other functions, also of variable a?
Thank you

 

[Svein]

Sorry, there are errors in your code (a for loop is never coded that way).

Otherwise read up on pointers to functions (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/840501/how-do-function-pointers-in-c-work). They prefer typedefs (and so do I)

typedef int (*myFuncDef)(int, int);

With that in mind, you can create a struct containing a pointer to a function and the necessary parameters. You can even create a union denoting different function types and different sets of parameters. Arrays or linked lists of those...

 

[jim mcnamara]

I think the OP is using another tool, not C. Although C is ideal for that sort of thing.

 

[wle]

Don't know Mathematica, but maybe it's worth checking if some of what you've written really means what you think it does. For example,

In the above code, I receive a list of functions like this one:

bits2[a_] := List[
   {(w + a), -d},
   {-a, -d},
   {-(w + a), -(t + d)},
   {-a, -(t + d)},
   {-a, -d},
   {(w - a), -d},
   {-a, -(t + d)},
   {(w - a), -(t + d)}
   ];

According to the Mathematica documentation f[a_] := ... is the syntax for defining a function taking a parameter a, so what you've written above would define bits2 as a single function that returns a list (depending on the value of the parameter a), and not a list of functions. Likewise in your code, you have

     auxList[a_] := List[]

... which would make auxList a function that evaluates to an empty list regardless of what the parameter a is, after which I have no idea what you're expecting

       auxList[a] = ...

in your loop to do.

If you actually want to create lots of new functions in a loop and return a list of them then maybe the thing to look up is how to create anonymous functions. Apparently these are called "pure functions" in Mathematica: https://reference.wolfram.com/language/tutorial/PureFunctions.html.

 

[RicardoMP]

I think the OP is using another tool, not C. Although C is ideal for that sort of thing.

Indeed! I'm using Mathematica! Meanwhile, I recently solved my problem. I simply defined Hyfield as a function of "a" and I avoid declaring auxlist as a function of a. That did the trick!