Undergrad How to approach a cross product question

Click For Summary
To approach cross product questions in physics, it's essential to understand the properties and identities of vector operations. Begin by familiarizing yourself with the vector triple product identity, which is crucial for deriving the given relationships. Utilize component notation for vectors to simplify calculations and apply techniques like summation convention and Levi-Cevita symbols. Exploring recommended resources, such as the suggested essay, can deepen your understanding of the geometric concepts involved. Mastering these foundational elements will enhance your ability to tackle cross product problems effectively.
gregi_2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I am hoping for advice on how to approach a what I assume to be cross product related problem that I have never encountered before
I am beginning this new general physics course and I have encountered a question involved with what I assume to be cross products, a topic that I have very little experience with. I am not looking for a direct answer to the problem but advice on what steps should be taken in order to learn how to answer the problem. The problem is as follows,

Demonstrate the following relationship: a x (b x c) = (a · c)b - (a · b)c
Starting from this relationship derive expressions for the following
(a x b) · (c x d)
(a x b)^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should write out the vectors in terms of their components! There are quite a few tricks to make the process simpler, like using summation convention, Kroneker deltas and Levi-Cevita symbols, knowing a few cute identities, but you'll get there nonetheless.
 
gregi_2 said:
I am not looking for a direct answer to the problem but advice on what steps should be taken in order to learn how to answer the problem.
If you find the time, then https://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.5935.pdf is a recommendable essay to study the geometric concepts which are used in physics.
 
  • Love
Likes etotheipi
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K