How to Approach the Fourier Transform of an Annulus?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the Fourier Transform (FT) of a piecewise function defined in polar coordinates, specifically for an annulus. The function is defined as f(r,θ) = 0 for r < r_inner and r > r_outer, with a non-zero expression between these bounds. Participants suggest expressing the function as a product of radial and angular components, R(r) and T(θ), and utilizing the Fourier Transform formula for polar coordinates. The integral simplifies due to the function's zero values outside the defined range, allowing for a focused computation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transforms in polar coordinates
  • Familiarity with piecewise functions and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometric identities and transformations
  • Experience with double integrals and their applications in Fourier analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier Transforms for piecewise functions
  • Learn about the application of trigonometric identities in Fourier analysis
  • Explore advanced techniques for evaluating double integrals in polar coordinates
  • Investigate the implications of symmetry in Fourier Transforms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with Fourier analysis, particularly those dealing with polar coordinate systems and piecewise functions.

tx213
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I've been using this site for a while now, but this is going to be my first post. I want to pick your brains to get some insight on this problem I'm tackling.

I'm trying to take a Fourier Transform of a function. My function is a function of (r,phi) and it is a piecewise function where:

f(r,θ) = 0 , r < r_inner
f(r,θ) = cos(θ)^2 + (-0.5)*sin(θ)^2 , r_inner ≤r ≤ r_outter
f(r,θ) = 0 , r > r_outter

I've attached a figure here.
forupload.jpg
Can I take the FT of the pieces individually and then sum? My knowledge so far tells me this is OK. Since my function is in polar coordinates, I should take the FT in polar coordinates; is there an efficient (clever) way to go about this given the the nature of the function, perhaps that it is symmetric every n*pi ?

Any suggestions/insight would be really appreciated. Thanks in advance!
T
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "best" way to do this depends on how you want to use the transform.

A good way to start is probably to write f(r,θ) = R(r)T(θ), where R(r) is 0 or 1, and T(θ} = cos(θ)^2 + (-0.5)*sin(θ)^2.

Using elementary trig formulas, T(θ) = a + b cos(2θ) (work out the constants a and b for yourself!) so its Fourier transform is simple.

You could take the Fourier transform of R(r) for all non-negative values of r, or just restrict the way that you use the function, to the region where it is non-zero.
 
Ah awesome thanks for getting back! I made some more progress.

The Fourier transform in polar coordinates is defined as this (I will just list one of them).
F(ρ,ø) = FT[f(r,θ)] = ∫∫ ƒ(r,θ) * exp( i2\pi*ρ*r*cos(ø-θ) ) r dr dθ , r from 0→∞ , θ from 0→ 2 \pi.

This works great because f(r,θ) is 0 everywhere except between when r_inner ≤ r ≤ r_routter.
So I only need to take one integral, which is

∫∫ ƒ(r,θ) * exp( i2\pi*ρ*r*cos(ø-θ) ) r dr dθ , r from r_inner → r_outter , θ from 0→ 2 \pi , with ƒ(r,θ) = ( (3/4)*cos(2θ) ) + 1/4

Here I am stuck again. How should I think about taking/approaching this integral? Again, thanks in advance for any insight!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K