How to approach this photoelectric effect question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to the photoelectric effect, specifically focusing on calculating the time required for energy collection based on given power and energy values. The original poster is seeking guidance on how to approach the problem, as they have not yet covered the photoelectric effect in detail in their course.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to perform a classical calculation rather than using the photoelectric formula. There are attempts to relate power, work, and time using the equation P = W/T. Questions arise about unit consistency and the logic behind calculations involving the area of an atom versus the total area.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in reasoning through the problem, questioning assumptions about energy collection over different areas. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between power and area, and there is a recognition of the need to reassess calculations based on physical reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on ensuring unit consistency and understanding the implications of scaling energy collection from a larger area to the atomic level. The original poster expresses confusion about the approach, indicating that they are still working through the problem's requirements.

Safder Aree
Messages
42
Reaction score
1
I am currently taking my first Quantum Mechanics course and was given this problem in a practice set(we are supposed to refer to old intro textbooks). We haven't covered the photoelectric effect (just theory) much in class and reading through other textbooks, I wasn't able to find any similar questions. Any hints on how to approach this question would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

1. Homework Statement
https://i.imgur.com/1FT6skF.jpg

upload_2018-5-22_13-55-55.png


Homework Equations


KE = hf - phi

The Attempt at a Solution


I know phi, so KE = hf - 2.3eV
However, I do not know how to find f since I don't know wave length.
I also do not understand how I can relate it back to time.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-5-22_13-55-55.png
    upload_2018-5-22_13-55-55.png
    37.4 KB · Views: 388
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem is asking you to perform a classical calculation. That means that you should do it without recourse to the photoelectric formula which, as you already found out, is not useful here. You know the incident power, so find how long it will take for 2.3 eV to be collected.
 
kuruman said:
This problem is asking you to perform a classical calculation. That means that you should do it without recourse to the photoelectric formula which, as you already found out, is not useful here. You know the incident power, so find how long it will take for 2.3 eV to be collected.

Would this just be P = W/T? Then solving for T in this instance?
 
It would be that. Be careful how you use the numbers and watch the units that are given to you.
 
kuruman said:
It would be that. Be careful how you use the numbers and watch the units that are given to you.
So
2.3ev in Joules = 3.68501*10^-19

1.6*10^-9 = W/T
T = 1.6*10^9/3.68501*10^-19
T=2.303*10^-10

The units seems to work out if I did dimensional analysis right. If this right?
 
I don't understand your solution. Please explain your strategy or, at least, use symbols instead of numbers so that one can follow your logic.
Also, please put units next to numbers. What kind of units should W have in the equation P = W/T? What kind of units does 1.6×10-9 have as given in the question?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Safder Aree
kuruman said:
I don't understand your solution. Please explain your strategy or, at least, use symbols instead of numbers so that one can follow your logic.
Also, please put units next to numbers. What kind of units should W have in the equation P = W/T? What kind of units does 1.6×10-9 have as given in the question?

Okay I'll write in the units.

So Power is in watts (J/S)

P = 1.6*10^-9 J/s
W= 2.3eV = 3.68501*10^-19 Joules

Therefore,

P= W/T
T = W/P

T = (1.6*10^9 J/s) /(3.68501*10^-19 J)
T=2.303*10^-10s
 
That's the time required for the entire area to collect 2.3 eV because P is the area of the cathode. Is that the time that the question is asking you to find?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Safder Aree
kuruman said:
That's the time required for the entire area to collect 2.3 eV because P is the area of the cathode. Is that the time that the question is asking you to find?

No it's asking for it over the area of one atom. So this is my strategy to find that:

Find the area of the atom (assuming 2d dimensions):
A= pi*r^2
A = 3.14159*10^-18m^2

Then multiply the time by the ratio of A/Total Area:

=2.303*10^-10s * (3.14159*10^-18 m^2)/(1*10^-3 m^2)
=7.235*10^-25
 
  • #10
Safder Aree said:
No it's asking for it over the area of one atom. So this is my strategy to find that:

Find the area of the atom (assuming 2d dimensions):
A= pi*r^2
A = 3.14159*10^-18m^2

Then multiply the time by the ratio of A/Total Area:

=2.303*10^-10s * (3.14159*10^-18 m^2)/(1*10^-3 m^2)
=7.235*10^-25
I assume your numbers are given in seconds. Please avoid calculating numbers without trying to figure out if your answers make sense. Here is a question I have: If it takes T=2.303*10^-10s for the entire area to collect 2.3 eV, does it make sense that an atom, which has a much much smaller area, will collect the same amount of energy in only 7.235*10^-25 s?
 
  • #11
kuruman said:
I assume your numbers are given in seconds. Please avoid calculating numbers without trying to figure out if your answers make sense. Here is a question I have: If it takes T=2.303*10^-10s for the entire area to collect 2.3 eV, does it make sense that an atom, which has a much much smaller area, will collect the same amount of energy in only 7.235*10^-25 s?

You're right, it doesn't make sense it takes less time to collect more energy with less surface area. Would swapping the ratio be the correct method? So taking Total Area/area of the atom?
 
  • #12
What do you think? Don't guess, but reason it out. If the total area of 1 mm2 receives 1.6×10-9 W, what fraction of that power does one atom receive given the radius of one atom?
 
  • #13
kuruman said:
What do you think? Don't guess, but reason it out. If the total area of 1 mm2 receives 1.6×10-9 W, what fraction of that power does one atom receive given the radius of one atom?
This makes sense now to me. I was confused about the how to approach it. Thank you for all the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K