Photoelectric Effect: X-ray, 2 Metals, 5 & 2.3eV Work Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the photoelectric effect involving X-rays produced by an electron striking a metal surface. The scenario includes two metals with different work functions of 5 eV and 2.3 eV.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply energy equations related to the photoelectric effect but expresses uncertainty about the next steps. Participants question the clarity of the original post and suggest that the question may be confusing due to language barriers. There is a discussion about the energy equation and its application to the problem, particularly regarding the frequency of the X-ray and its ability to liberate electrons from the metals based on their work functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the original question and exploring the implications of the energy equations presented. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the energy transfer and the conditions for liberating electrons from the metals.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion in the original problem statement, including missing parts and unclear phrasing. The discussion reflects a need for clearer communication of the problem details.

Ekramul Towsif
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


X·ray is produced when an electron is incident on a metal surface with ##2x10^8 ms^-1## velocity
.Applying this X-ray on the surface of two metals having work function of 5 eV and 2.3eV, photoelectric effect is observed.
e by

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


##E = K_{max} + \phi##
##hf = \frac 1 2mv^2 + hf_o##

i got stucked here. i don't know what to do next
[/B]
 

Attachments

  • 15491787_1814655888808897_98703582_o.jpg
    15491787_1814655888808897_98703582_o.jpg
    33 KB · Views: 444
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your post is difficult to read, and confused. Could you more accurately produce the question as it was asked?
 
Cutter Ketch said:
Your post is difficult to read, and confused. Could you more accurately produce the question as it was asked?
which part or portion is difficult to undestand ?
 
Ekramul Towsif said:
which part or portion is difficult to undestand ?

Well this is very interesting. I would have quoted the confused questions in the OP: the lack of a part a or b, the fact that part d was neither a sentence nor a question nor in fact an intelligible phrase, but it appears you've edited the post. Now there are no questions at all and you've pasted in a picture of your problem. Now here's the interesting part. Although better than the OP, the question as given to you is pretty confused. I presume that whoever wrote it speaks something other than English as a first language. Ok, well let's see what we can do.

From your unedited OP I presume you've answered a and b. For c you posted an energy equation which appears to be for scattering in that there is an h f0. Here there is no h f0. The electron does not necessarily have to give all of its energy to a single X-ray, but that is the most it can do, so I think that is what they want you to assume. So what is the frequency of the x-ray if all of the kinetic energy of the electron produces one x-ray photon?

The last part seems to be asking if that frequency of an X-ray can liberate an electron given the two work functions. Well, does it have enough energy?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
9K