How to avoid killing birds with wind turbines

[Ivan Seeking]

Stories about bird kills caused by wind turbines are common. I really don't see why this is a problem. It seems to me that something fairly simple could be done; lights, sound, optical effects using colored paints...something. Does anyone know much about this?

 

[Moonbear]

I could possibly help from the perspective of bird behavior, but I would first need to know more about what sort of wind turbines you're talking about. Are you talking about something for generating electricity? Where are they located? And are there specific types of birds causing trouble? I assume this isn't like jet engines where it has little to do with birds flying in and more to do with them getting sucked in once they get too close.

Some birds are hard to get rid of. You can put out dogs, set off pyrotechnics (for sound or light), etc, but after a while, they seem to stop fearing whatever is out there and return. If it's small birds, things that look like predators (paint on faces that look like owls, or put owl decoys nearby) can keep them away. But I don't know enough about what you're using them for to know if this is feasible or would hinder the function of the turbines.

 

[Pengwuino]

I think he's talking about jet engines because other turbines arent really vulnerable to birds.

The problem is that its case-specific. it depends on what bird is around. I remember seeing one case study where they used a falcon because the falcon liked to prey on the birds that normally flew around there. Some birds probably don't respond correctly to sound or lights. Plus any decently bright light might present problems to incoming or outgoing aircraft.

 

[brewnog]

He's talking about wind turbines, the ones used to generate electricity. I'm not so sure it's the turbines which are vulnerable to the birds, more the other way round!

I've personally not heard of it being a problem, but as Pengwuino said, birds of prey are often used to control populations of other birds which are causing a problem (I believe a pair of Buzzards were introduced to Battersea Power Station when it was mothballed to keep pigeons away), but then I suppose you need measures to stop the birds of prey killing themselves on the turbines!

If this is a real problem, I don't know what could be done, - the length of blades and speed of rotation is such that it may not be obvious for a bird to realize that they're in the path of a turbine blade. Ultrasound repellants? Scarecrows?

 

[Averagesupernova]

Smarter birds?

 

[Danger]

My first response, of course, would be to put nets under the turbines, collect the carcasses, and open a restaurant.
As for birds flying into the things because of not noticing them... I've heard a lot about bats dying the same way, and they are a lot more adept at detecting and avoiding things like that.
One of my friends back east owns a bunch of orchards and berry patches, and his cure for birds was a sound system that played a really raucous noise every couple of minutes. I believe that it was a bird call of some sort played backwards at extreme volume. Sounded sort of like when you whack a power-line guywire with a stick. Other farmers in the area used calcium carbide cannons that went off every few minutes. Both were pretty effective.
If I lived in the affected area, I'd be more than happy to have someone pay me to sit around all day with a 12 gauge and intercept incoming featherballs.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

Yes, sorry, I was talking about large wind turbines for generating electricity. I recently heard one report of over 4000 birds killed on just one wind farm; I guess this year... not sure of the time span. But it seems that this is becoming a real problem. Some new wind power installations have been delayed due to concerns by wildlife experts and advocates.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

Isn't this a simple problem of the birds being oblivious to the presence of the turbine? If something made the turbine visible to the birds, wouldn't they avoid it?

As for the types of birds killed, presumably it varies with the location of the wind farm, but AFAIK, this issue has been noted for years at many locations around the world.

 

[Danger]

It seems to me that most wind farms are preferentially located on coastal cliffs because that's one of the windiest environments. If that's true, then the birds involved are probably gulls, swallows, terns, etc.. I wonder if there might be a vacuum effect surrounding a turbine so that even if a bird does see it at the last second it can't veer away. Other than painting the things bright colours, making a lot of noise, and maybe building mesh enclosures around them, I can't think of a solution just off the top of my head.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

btw, this may have been more appropriate for the Bio Forum but in the end it is an engineering problem...but then again, maybe that's why we have a bunch of dead birds.

 

[Moonbear]

btw, this may have been more appropriate for the Bio Forum but in the end it is an engineering problem...but then again, maybe that's why we have a bunch of dead birds.

I guess it depends on the solution we find for the problem. We might find a mechanical solution that just blocks the birds from getting in (engineering) or a behavioral solution that alters the behavior of the birds so they don't go there (biology). We'll just have to work together for now.

The problem with bright colors is that you'd have to choose a color based on the particular problem species. You don't want to pick a color they associate with the flowers they seek nectar from, or that their mates display in their feathers. You'd also have to assess if this is an ongoing problem, a few birds a day, or are they mainly having trouble being along a migratory route where a large flock shows up and winds up in the turbines all in one or two days.

If it's a single species, identifying an appropriate predator call and broadcasting it over speakers might work. But, then that might depend on the predator. If you have dogs barking, the birds might fly up to higher ground...right into the turbines.

Netting would keep birds out, though it sounds like a highly impractical approach if you need to cover many many acres of land. And if the concern is trying to avoid killing birds rather than trying to avoid gumming up your turbines with dead birds, then you'll still run into trouble with smaller species getting tangled up in the netting (you'd have to use a color that contrasts well against the background so the birds see it before they fly smackdab into it).

Hmm..can you put some sort of shimmering reflective coating on the turbines rather than a color? I'm thinking something like metallic paint that has all those reflective flecks in it so that as it turns, it catches the light differently and becomes visible...the idea of contrast with the background seems to be the key.

Is anything currently done? It would be helpful to know if anything has already been attempted and failed.

 

[brewnog]

The problem with colourful blades is that the turbines spin relatively slowly, so the birds will still think that it's safe*, which it is for a third of a second or so, and then they get a bit of a shock.


*Remember, brewnog is engineer, not birdy psychologist![/size]

I think Darwinism in Action is the best policy. I'm sure our future generations will thank us for weeding out the stupid birds, and will be proud of the clever birdy legacy we leave them.

 

[russ_watters]

Isn't this a simple problem of the birds being oblivious to the presence of the turbine? If something made the turbine visible to the birds, wouldn't they avoid it?

That would be my guess. The question is, would a glow-in-the dark or fluorescent orange turbine be an acceptable eyesore? I have whistles on my car that are supposed to be able to repel deer - perhaps there is something similar that can repel birds? Other than that - giant chicken-wire nets over the turbines?

 

[hitssquad]

The problem with colourful blades is that the turbines spin relatively slowly, so the birds will still think that it's safe*, which it is for a third of a second or so, and then they get a bit of a shock.

Could you please be more explicit?

 

[Moonbear]

That would be my guess. The question is, would a glow-in-the dark or fluorescent orange turbine be an acceptable eyesore? I have whistles on my car that are supposed to be able to repel deer - perhaps there is something similar that can repel birds? Other than that - giant chicken-wire nets over the turbines?

I don't know if whistles would work or not. I'm not even totally sure they work for deer, but unless you run into a deer despite having whistles on your car, you won't be certain either.

As for colors being acceptable eyesores, how aesthetically pleasing are the turbines in the first place? (Brewnog, I was thinking something moving so fast it would be a blur, not really slowly...I think birds know how to get out of the way of something moving slowly if they know it's there, unless they are flying through while it looks "safe" and wind up in trouble only once on the other side?)

It seems chicken wire would more or less do the job. Not sure the gaps are small enough to keep little birds out, but they'll at least have to slow down, perch and hop through rather than flying full speed into a turbine. I have no idea what these things look like though. Is chicken wire feasible? And would that cause other problems, like catching debris and hindering the airflow? Plus, chicken wire rusts, so needs to be replaced every so many years. It should work from the bird side of things, but does it work from the turbine side of things?

 

[brewnog]

Could you please be more explicit?

I'll try.

As for colors being acceptable eyesores, how aesthetically pleasing are the turbines in the first place?

Through my eyes, they're truly beautiful. Not so sure about bright colours from an aesthetic point of view, these things are controversial enough as it stands.

Brewnog, I was thinking something moving so fast it would be a blur, not really slowly...I think birds know how to get out of the way of something moving slowly if they know it's there, unless they are flying through while it looks "safe" and wind up in trouble only once on the other side?

They're reasonably slow, in terms of RPM. Numbers out of my head say something to the order of 1 revolution per second. They're easily slow enough to watch go round, without getting dizzy. However, the blades are so long that the velocity at their tips (or even along the edge), the speed of the blade through the air can be considerable, and I suppose plenty fast enough to slice through/wallop anything which gets in its way.

I imagine that just seeing the blades coming is not enough for birds, - plenty of birds see my car coming, but that doesn't stop them from flying into my path. As far as they're concerned, nothing is supposed to move that quickly! Again, I'll state that I'm not a chartered bird psychologist.

I like the idea of sonic/ultrasonic repellents, but have no idea whether you can target them for birds, and there's always Moonbear's problem of them realising that there's no real threat (ha!) and getting used to the sound.

Is this really a problem then Ivan, or are you yanking our cranks?

 

[brewnog]

Oh, and Moonbear, this picture might give you more of an idea of the size of these things!

http://www.westernpower.com.au/images/11.06.01/awf_5.jpg

Chickenwire that!

 

[Moonbear]

Thanks for the picture, that helps. Yeah, I'd say chicken wire is out. Though, I could see where the white might not contrast much against the sky for the birds to gauge how fast the thing is coming at them. Okay, if not bright colors, because I can see where that might be an eyesore, what about adding some black stripes to the blades? If you put the stripes the length of the blade, it should provide some contrast (having both the black and white would make it contrast against the sky no matter the weather), but not look hideous like stripes around the blade would look.

I modified that picture to show that black blades aren't so bad either.

 

[hitssquad]

Turbine tip speed

They're reasonably slow, in terms of RPM. Numbers out of my head say something to the order of 1 revolution per second.

For a 390-foot-diameter turbine, that would be a tip speed of 1225 feet per second, which is 835 miles per hour.

the blades are so long that the velocity at their tips (or even along the edge), the speed of the blade through the air can be considerable

Typical tip speed is 100 to 200 miles per hour.

 

[brewnog]

For a 390-foot-diameter turbine, that would be a tip speed of 1225 feet per second, which is 835 miles per hour.



Typical tip speed is 100 to 200 miles per hour.

There you go then, even slower than I thought!

 

[Moonbear]

Typical tip speed is 100 to 200 miles per hour.

Wow! It's possible that even if the bird sees it coming, it just can't get out of the way fast enough.

Does anyone know where along the blade the birds get clocked? Is it somewhat random, or are the getting clipped just at the tips? Maybe just a black or reflective tip would help them see the end is coming soon!

(Oh, and Brewnog, no worries about your disclaimers regarding bird psychology; when it comes to bird psychology, I'm a bit of a "quack" myself <--that's me laughing at my bad pun because nobody else will.)

 

[brewnog]

Does anyone know where along the blade the birds get clocked? Is it somewhat random, or are the getting clipped just at the tips? Maybe just a black or reflective tip would help them see the end is coming soon!

Presumably across the whole blade length, although obviously the impact will be worse (or better, depending on which way you look at it) at the blade tips. I think hitssquad has made it pretty clear that even the most quick-witted birds might have trouble getting out of the way, even if they did see the imminent danger.

Oh, and Brewnog, no worries about your disclaimers regarding bird psychology; when it comes to bird psychology, I'm a bit of a "quack" myself <--that's me laughing at my bad pun because nobody else will.

Ha. Ha. Ha.
That was a really cheep joke.

 

[Moonbear]

Presumably across the whole blade length, although obviously the impact will be worse (or better, depending on which way you look at it) at the blade tips. I think hitssquad has made it pretty clear that even the most quick-witted birds might have trouble getting out of the way, even if they did see the imminent danger.

Hmm...anyone want to pay me to sit out at a wind farm and bird watch?

Ha. Ha. Ha.
That was a really cheep joke.

<<<<<groan>>>>>

 

[brewnog]

Hmm...anyone want to pay me to sit out at a wind farm and bird watch?

Danger already offered to do it. I'm assuming he just wanted to use his shotgun to warn them of their impending tubine doom.

<<<<<groan>>>>>

You started it![/size]

 

[Moonbear]

Danger already offered to do it. I'm assuming he just wanted to use his shotgun to warn them of their impending tubine doom.

No, no, no, I'd be observing and studying, not shooing them away from the turbines. I want to know when, where and how they get thwacked! Then we can properly design something to avoid thwacking birds.

You started it![/size]

But you made it worse. [/size]

 

[Ivan Seeking]

Is this really a problem then Ivan, or are you yanking our cranks?

Me?

No, my understanding is that this has gotten to be a significant problem in some areas. at least. It is possible that it has received little attention until now, but is beginning to get more.

 

[Ivan Seeking]

Oh I get it. You haven't forgiven me for that report from Roy's News Service; Moscow?

 

[Danger]

Then we can properly design something to avoid thwacking birds.

That sounds suspiciously like it belongs in the 'turtle-polishing and chicken-choking' thread.

I misinterpreted the first post here, so the mesh thing doesn't make sense. To me, the term 'turbines' suggested the vertical type, that look like a tall blender made of helicopter rotors on end. I've always just thought of the pictured kind as 'windmills'.

 

[hitssquad]

Darrieus and Savonius turbines

They are not milling grain or wood, Danger. Two vertical-axis types of wind turbines are the Darrieus ("eggbeater") and the Savonius.
http://muextension.missouri.edu/xplor/agguides/agengin/g01981.htm

 

[Moonbear]

They are not milling grain or wood, Danger.

I have to admit that when brewnog posted the picture, the first thing I thought was, "Oh, windmills!" But then after a moment of reflection, realized there's no mill attached. Nonetheless, I think that's what us non-engineer-types call those things when we see them. Ooh, we can make them very brightly-colored and call them pinwheels.
Okay, I'll shut up now. [/size]

 

[brewnog]

I have to admit that when brewnog posted the picture, the first thing I thought was, "Oh, windmills!" But then after a moment of reflection, realized there's no mill attached. Nonetheless, I think that's what us non-engineer-types call those things when we see them. Ooh, we can make them very brightly-colored and call them pinwheels.
Okay, I'll shut up now. [/size]

We tend to call them Wind Farms, but that's when there's more than one of them, I don't suppose you get them on their own.

Stunningly beautiful things though. I was driving back from a job interview a few months back, and went past a wind farm on some clifftops in the Lake District, just as the sun was setting over the sea behind them. I had to stop and watch them for a few minutes, they're gorgeous. They're just so slender and slow moving (in a spinny way), when they're silhouetted they're almost as beautiful as suspension bridges.

One of the biggest arguments used against wind farms is that they're an eyesore, and that they're noisy. Strangely, one study showed that people who live near them are more likely to support their use and slate these issues.

 

[willib]

I think its strange that on page two of this thread are Bird control Products for sale..,
and wind generators for sale...

 

[Loren Booda]

How about including a wind-driven whistle like those mounted on some cars?

How to avoid killing birds with picture windows? Decals?

 

[Danger]

They are not milling grain or wood, Danger.

Well, they could be. I mean, really now... it doesn't show what's going on in those little buildings.

Two vertical-axis types of wind turbines are the Darrieus ("eggbeater") and the Savonius.

I'd forgotten about the Savonius type. It's the Darrieus that I was thinking of. Of both types, though, the ones that I've seen were an awful lot higher in proportion to their diameter than the ones shown in your link.

 

[Moonbear]

How about including a wind-driven whistle like those mounted on some cars?

Someone else mentioned that earlier...Russ I think. Not sure if it would work or not. Does anyone know if they work against birds when they're on cars? And would something like that reduce the efficiency of the turbines by creating additional drag?

How to avoid killing birds with picture windows? Decals?

I like using those sun catchers. Putting screens on your windows works too, for two reasons actually, 1) you don't get that bright reflection of the outdoors on the window and 2) if the bird flies into it anyway, they bounce off the screen - I've seen birds do this and they seem to sit on the ground stunned a moment, but then fly away seemingly unharmed, unlike when they smack right into hard glass.

I'm sure just not washing the windows will work too.

 

[pallidin]

For this type of problem, we must understand that a bird does not view the wind turbine as solid and, seemingly, does not account for it's rotation.
The trick, then, is to make the wind turbine appear solid.

Offset colored streamers attached to the blades could work during daytime.
You would have, say. 14 of them placed at equal intervals on the "first" blade starting from the top, and on the second and third blades they would be offset from the first placement intervals, giving an illusion of solidity in rotation.
But at night, gosh, that's tough. The least costly might be to use those same streamers and illuminated both the back and front with mirror directed strobe lights extended say, 4-feet from the generator, both front and back, thus illuminating the streamers.
Just my thoughts.

 

[hitssquad]

we must understand that a bird does not view the wind turbine as solid

Then why do birds perch on the spinning blades?

 

[hitssquad]

This is interesting:
http://www.ohiowind.org/ohiowind/page.cfm?pageID=2037

Early turbines were mounted on towers 60 to 80 feet in height and had rotors 50 to 60 feet in diameter which turned at rates of 60 to 80 revolutions per minute (rpm). Today's wind machines are mounted on towers 200 to 260 feet in height and have rotors ranging from 150 to 260 feet in diameter that turn at rates of 11 to 28 rpm. Although some turbine models allow rotors to “overspeed” briefly to accommodate abrupt wind gusts, blade tip speeds under normal operating conditions have not increased appreciably with the use of larger turbines. The turbine’s tip speed at rated output can range from 138-182 mph. The rotor speed range is 14.4-28.5 rpm.1 Large turbines produce much more electricity per machine than small turbines, and there are generally fewer machines with wider spacing in modern wind developments. Still larger turbines are being developed for the future.

 

[Dr.Brain]

We can use 'rotating-rings' , the angular speed of both the rings has to be setup in such a way that probability of bird entering in the 'ring-sphere' is minimum , the material to be used on the outside of these rings should be rubber (to avoid injuries if a bird strikes the rings ) or a shiny surface can be used on the outside of these rings , because these rings will rotate randomly covering every possible part of the sphere such that a bird coming in any direction and flying a good 15 metres away surely sees the sun's reflection in the shiny surface. Trust me i have seen birds flying away from sun's reflection because they can't see anything .

BJ

 

[hitssquad]

Darrieus turbine revisited

We can use 'rotating-rings'

The Darrieus turbine. It was mentioned above.

the angular speed of both the rings has to be setup in such a way that probability of bird entering in the 'ring-sphere' is minimum

Turbines have blades. Even Darrieus turbines have blades. Birds run into or get hit by those blades. This is the problem we are discussing.

the material to be used on the outside of these rings should be rubber (to avoid injuries if a bird strikes the rings)

Rubber amplifies the acceleration of striking objects and hence amplifies biological damage. This is why baseball helmets are not made of rubber.

 

[Dr.Brain]

Sorry but i am not expert on 'MATERIALS' , maybe material experts can find a better way out.I just explained a model which cam eout of mind.

BJ

 

[brewnog]

We can use 'rotating-rings' , the angular speed of both the rings has to be setup in such a way that probability of bird entering in the 'ring-sphere' is minimum

What, just adding more spinning things, but at even higher speeds?

I think that would work against the problem we're trying to solve. Not only will birds still be able to get into the turbine path, they'll also be able to get whacked by these rotating rings too.

 

[Dr.Brain]

What, just adding more spinning things, but at even higher speeds?

I think that would work against the problem we're trying to solve. Not only will birds still be able to get into the turbine path, they'll also be able to get whacked by these rotating rings too.

I had rather say 'poor birds' rather trying to solve the problem , I wish I could make them intelligent.

Anyways I would invite 'improvements' to my model rather than criticising the lack of intelligence of the birds

BJ

 

[Danger]

rather than criticising the lack of intelligence of the birds

The term 'bird-brain' did arise for a reason, you know.

What about flying randomly located mylar balloons around the area, with perhaps a bunch attached to the top of each tower? Maybe the combination of reflectiveness and erratic movement would scare the birds away. They could be illuminated with flood lights at night.

 

[Lisa!]

Please stop killing birds!You're even allowed to kill humans but not birds!
Maybe they cause some problem for them, so they can't find their direction!

 

[brewnog]

How about some absolutely massive scarecrows?

Just make some copies of The Angel of the North, dress it up in some rags and a big straw hat, and put one in every wind farm!

 

[Lisa!]

brewnog, are you ready to be killed instead of my birds?

 

[Danger]

brewnog, are you ready to be killed instead of my birds?

Your birds?
Good grief, woman... if they're yours, just keep them at home and we won't have this problem. Really, you people who let your pets roam free...

 

[Lisa!]

Your birds?
Good grief, woman... if they're yours, just keep them at home and we won't have this problem. Really, you people who let your pets roam free...

I do!But you don't know whole the world is my home ! (I recommend you not to call me woman, right! )

 

[Moonbear]

How about some absolutely massive scarecrows?

Just make some copies of The Angel of the North, dress it up in some rags and a big straw hat, and put one in every wind farm!

The whole scarecrow concept is why I lean toward skepticism that anything will really help. Ever look out in a garden or field with a scarecrow and see the crows perching on it?

I really suspect the problem is there's no way for the birds to learn. Those that fly too close end up dead before they can learn not to do that again.