B How to calculate a random measurement error?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two formulas for measuring random error: the standard deviation and the mean absolute deviation. The standard deviation formula, which is the first one presented, is the conventional method for calculating variability in data sets. The mean absolute deviation, while simpler and sometimes used in machine learning for efficiency, is less common in fields like experimental physics. Participants agree that for accurate scientific measurements, the standard deviation is the preferred choice. Overall, the standard deviation is emphasized as the more reliable metric for error calculation.
Lotto
Messages
251
Reaction score
16
TL;DR Summary
How to calculate a random measurement error? If we did a measurement and want to calculate a random error, what formula are we to use?
I have seen this formula

$$\sigma=\sqrt{\frac {\sum_{i=1}^{N}{(X_i- \bar{X})^2}}{N(N-1)}}$$

but also this formula $$\sigma =\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{N}{|X_i- \bar {X}|}}{N}.$$ Which of them is correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one :smile:

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes Dale and vanhees71
The first one is the standard deviation. That is the usual one. The second one is the mean absolute deviation and it is rarely used at all.
 
Dale said:
The second one is the mean absolute deviation and it is rarely used at all.
Some machine learning applications seem to use it - I think because it's cheaper to calculate, so it gives you a time saving if you can live with the less mathematically nice behaviour. But in experimental physics I agree it's a no, you want the standard deviation.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top