B How to calculate a random measurement error?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two formulas for measuring random error: the standard deviation and the mean absolute deviation. The standard deviation formula, which is the first one presented, is the conventional method for calculating variability in data sets. The mean absolute deviation, while simpler and sometimes used in machine learning for efficiency, is less common in fields like experimental physics. Participants agree that for accurate scientific measurements, the standard deviation is the preferred choice. Overall, the standard deviation is emphasized as the more reliable metric for error calculation.
Lotto
Messages
251
Reaction score
16
TL;DR Summary
How to calculate a random measurement error? If we did a measurement and want to calculate a random error, what formula are we to use?
I have seen this formula

$$\sigma=\sqrt{\frac {\sum_{i=1}^{N}{(X_i- \bar{X})^2}}{N(N-1)}}$$

but also this formula $$\sigma =\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{N}{|X_i- \bar {X}|}}{N}.$$ Which of them is correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one :smile:

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes Dale and vanhees71
The first one is the standard deviation. That is the usual one. The second one is the mean absolute deviation and it is rarely used at all.
 
Dale said:
The second one is the mean absolute deviation and it is rarely used at all.
Some machine learning applications seem to use it - I think because it's cheaper to calculate, so it gives you a time saving if you can live with the less mathematically nice behaviour. But in experimental physics I agree it's a no, you want the standard deviation.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top