How to calculate BMEP from P-V Graphs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nb89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs
Click For Summary
Calculating Brake Mean Effective Pressure (BMEP) from P-V graphs is feasible by integrating pressure and volume data to determine work done, which can then be converted to power. The integration of the P-V curve yields Indicated Mean Effective Pressure (IMEP), and this can be used to derive BMEP. Users can employ numerical integration methods, such as the trapezoidal rule in Excel, or utilize a planimeter for manual calculations. While integrating real curves can be challenging, using software or graph paper can simplify the process. Overall, understanding these methods is crucial for accurate BMEP calculations from P-V data.
nb89
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I have a P-V trace for a wide open throttle and a part load. Is it possible to calculate the BMEP from these graphs?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
see Horsepower - Please help - Confused! posted on Feb 14 2009

BMEP = ( Hp x 13000) / ( liter displacement x RPM)
 
that doesn't really help considering all i am given are values of different pressures and volumes
 
If you have pressure and volume you may integrate PdV to determine work, then divide by time to determine power.

For example, if you have a table of values that give pressure and volume, you should be able to take average pressure (gage pressure, not absolute) and change in volume, multiply to obtain work, then sum all work done over a single cycle (360 degrees of crankshaft rotation for a 2 stroke, 720 degrees for a 4 stroke) and divide by time it takes for that cycle to get power.
 
Sure, integrate to find the area enclosed by the PV curve; this gives you the IMEP.
 
Q_Goest is bang on the money with this one, I used a similar type of thing in my masters disseration. Designing a vintage V8 racing engine using simulation techniques. huzzah.

Integrating real curves is a *****, either find a program that can make approximate curves from a set of data points or break out the graph paper.
 
xxChrisxx said:
Integrating real curves is a *****, either find a program that can make approximate curves from a set of data points or break out the graph paper.

If you have no better software than Excel, you can use a trapezoidal numerical integration approach reasonably well so long as the x-interval is pretty small compared to the sample length.

But when it comes to a manual method, use a planimeter! I've mentioned before with PV diagrams, they're absolutely fantastic and much better than counting squares :)
 
Those are two marvellous suggestions. I feel especially silly about the numerical integration in excel as that is probably the easiest way to do it, I should have known that but never even thought to use the trapezoid rule. :(
 
xxChrisxx said:
Those are two marvellous suggestions. I feel especially silly about the numerical integration in excel as that is probably the easiest way to do it, I should have known that but never even thought to use the trapezoid rule. :(
Actually, if you used the average pressure between two datapoints then you used the trapezoid rule! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
777
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K