Otto cycle mathematical model - Heat added by combustion?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on enhancing a spreadsheet model of the Otto cycle by refining the calculation of heat added during combustion, specifically the 'Qin' value. Two methods for calculating 'Qin' were presented: the first involves a formula using volume and air-fuel ratio (AFR), resulting in a high ignition temperature and torque figure, while the second method utilizes the higher heating value (HHV) of fuel, yielding a lower ignition temperature and torque. The user seeks guidance on which method is more accurate, as discrepancies arise with varying AFR values. The integration of Weiber functions is also mentioned as a future improvement to the model.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Otto cycle and its thermodynamic principles
  • Familiarity with combustion chemistry, specifically air-fuel ratio (AFR)
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic equations, including heat transfer calculations
  • Experience with spreadsheet modeling for engineering applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and application of the heat added formula in the Otto cycle
  • Explore the implications of varying air-fuel ratios on combustion efficiency
  • Study the use of Weiber functions in thermodynamic modeling
  • Investigate the relationship between ignition temperature and torque output in internal combustion engines
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, automotive researchers, and students studying thermodynamics and internal combustion engine performance who are looking to enhance their understanding of the Otto cycle and combustion modeling.

Kozy
Messages
140
Reaction score
7
I am attempting to improve a spreadsheet I created back in uni some 5-6 years ago, which models all the velocities and accelerations of the pistons and rods, as well calculating pressure, temperature and resulting torque. It is only a simple model so far, originally it started simply by calculating the temperature and pressure prior to ignition, then had an input for pressure at ignition (P4) from which the PV through power stroke was then calculated.

I have dug this out of my hard drive and would like to update it, replacing the P4 input with a calculated value taking into account AFR and compression ratio. So far I am having some difficulty with the 'Qin' heat added portion of this.

I have two methods for calculating this and I am unsure which, if any is correct.

Version 1:

Qin = V*1/(R*FAR)

Where:
V= V1+V2
R = 8.314
AFR = 1/AFR

This gives me 45951 of undisclosed units, I suspect joules.

Ignition temperature is then:

T4 = T3+(Qin/Cv)

Where:
T3 = 770°K
Qin = 45951
Cv = 3R/2 =12.471

Which gives me 4455°K

This method results in a torque figure with a BMEP of 291psi, however a leaner AFR does result in a hotter ignition temperature which would appear to be correct.

The second method was a bit more simple:

T4 = T3 + (HHVfuel * Mfuel)

Where:
T3 = 770°K
HHVfuel = 47.3Mj/kg
Mfuel = Mair * FAR = 4.6e-5

This resulted in a T4 of 2935°K which produced a better torque figure (BMEP of 170psi), but which become hotter with a richer AFR, which does not appear to be correct.

Can someone point me in the right direction with this? I've been chasing my tail for a while and in the absence of any thermodynamics textbooks I've not been able to find a decent answer to my problem.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Currently in the process of adding Weiber functions into the model, hopefully that should give a more realistic result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K