How to calculate elastic modulus

  • Thread starter Thread starter John54321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elastic Modulus
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the elastic modulus and selecting a suitable beam section for a structural engineering problem. Participants are addressing a homework question that involves determining the elastic modulus based on given loads and dimensions, while also ensuring that the maximum allowable bending stress is not exceeded. The conversation includes calculations, clarifications, and the interpretation of beam properties.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents calculations for stress and strain, leading to an elastic modulus value but expresses uncertainty about the correctness of these calculations.
  • Several participants question the completeness of the problem statement and the clarity of the provided information, indicating that key details are missing.
  • There is a discussion about the correct interpretation of forces and areas, with one participant clarifying that the total load on the beam includes both concentrated loads and a uniformly distributed load (UDL).
  • Another participant suggests that the question may be asking for the "elastic section modulus" rather than the elastic modulus of the material itself.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of calculating shear and bending moment distributions to solve the problem effectively.
  • One participant provides a shear force diagram and seeks confirmation on its accuracy, while others encourage calculating the bending moment diagram as well.
  • There is a mention of the flexure formula and discussions about the relationship between bending stress, moment of inertia, and the elastic section modulus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the problem statement is incomplete and that further calculations are necessary. However, there is no consensus on the correctness of the initial calculations provided or the interpretation of the elastic modulus versus the elastic section modulus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the provided problem statement, including missing definitions and assumptions regarding loads and beam properties. There are unresolved mathematical steps related to calculating shear forces and bending moments.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying structural engineering, particularly those dealing with beam calculations and the concepts of stress, strain, and elastic properties in materials.

  • #31
John54321 said:
So its got to be 184.375 (Knm) / 120 Mpa = 1.5365
What are the units of 1.5365? These are just as important as the number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Kn/m^2
 
  • #33
John54321 said:
Kn/m^2
Don't guess. Write out the units for the numerator and the denominator and cancel as required.

Remember that a pascal is a derived unit. Be sure to write it in terms of basic units.
 
  • #34
Correct that was a guess. But to be honest I'm not sure how the units would work out.
 
  • #35
John54321 said:
Correct that was a guess. But to be honest I'm not sure how the units would work out.
That's why I asked you to write them out, just like you were making a calculation with numbers, only using units in place of the numbers.

This is how you train yourself to figure out if the units of the answers to your calculation make sense.
 
  • #36
I don't know that is why I guessed ? I'm not sure what the units would be this is why I'm using this forum for help.
 
  • #37
John54321 said:
I don't know that is why I guessed ? I'm not sure what the units would be this is why I'm using this forum for help.

The Rules in the HW Forums at PF allow helpers to guide those with questions. We are not supposed to do your work for you.
You must do some work in order to learn the material.

I asked you to write out the units in the calculation quoted below:

John54321 said:
So its got to be 184.375 (Knm) / 120 Mpa = 1.5365

You have kN-m / MPa. I also told you that pascals (Pa) are derived units. Do you know the definition of a pascal?
 
  • #38
I understand that this is why I have showed all of my workings for the first 4 parts of the question.

Mpa is a unit measure of pressure.
 
  • #39
John54321 said:
I understand that this is why I have showed all of my workings for the first 4 parts of the question.

Mpa is a unit measure of pressure.
Yes, that's what it measures, but the pascal is a derived unit, which means it is made up of a combination of other units. What are those units?
 
  • #40
Yes internal stress, young modulus and ulltimate tensile strength.
 
  • #41
John54321 said:
Yes internal stress, young modulus and ulltimate tensile strength.
No. You keep describing things which Pascals are used to measure.

A pascal is made up of other units, things like meters, kilograms, and whatnot. Which other units are used to make pascals?

Hint: it's OK to google "pascal" if you don't know the answer off the top of your head.
 
  • #42
It's made up of N for Newton M for metre kg kilogram s second
 
  • #43
John54321 said:
It's made up of N for Newton M for metre kg kilogram s second
Yes, but how? What is the particular combination of these units which make up a Pascal but not something else?

Complete, this sentence: 1 pascal = 1 ?
 
  • #44
Hi SteamKing

1 pascal = 1 m ^-1 kg s^-2
 
  • #45
John54321 said:
Hi SteamKing

1 pascal = 1 m ^-1 kg s^-2
That's better.

A pascal is also expressed as a force / unit area. For our purposes, 1 Pa = 1 N / m2

Getting back to your last calculation:

John54321 said:
So its got to be 184.375 (Knm) / 120 Mpa = 1.5365

if you divided 103 N-m by (106 N/m2), what's left over?
 
  • #46
10^3N-m / 10^6N/^2 = 0.001n-m 0r 0.000001n-m^2 after its sqt

Not sure this is correct not done nothing like this before
 
  • #47
John54321 said:
10^3N-m / 10^6N/^2 = 0.001n-m 0r 0.000001n-m^2 after its sqt

Not sure this is correct not done nothing like this before
Sure you have, if you've studied algebra. Except instead of dividing units like N and m2, you were working with things like x and y. It's the same principle.

Now, in your calculation above, you are close, but there's a small error. I'm going to switch to Latex and make it easier to see:

##\frac{10^3 N⋅m}{10^6\frac{N}{m^2}} ##

Can you reduce the expression above, cancelling out the units which can cancel?
 
  • #48
Morning SteamKing

Are you talking about seeing it like this 1/1000 n-m^2 ?

If not I am not sure what to do if this isn't correct.
I
 
  • #49
John54321 said:
Morning SteamKing

Are you talking about seeing it like this 1/1000 n-m^2 ?

If not I am not sure what to do if this isn't correct.

I

Yes, but you're still not cancelling the units properly.

Remember, if you have a fraction like this: ##\frac{a}{\frac{a}{b}} ##

you invert the denominator and multiply by the numerator, like so: ##\frac{a}{\frac{a}{b}} = a ⋅ \frac{b}{a}=b##

Do this with your expression for the units: ##\frac{10^3 N⋅m}{10^6\frac{N}{m^2}}## and see what's left.
 
  • #50
So N-m being the denominator makes it be multiplied to N-M^2 end up as the numerator.

Sorry I don't get this ? maybe I need to sit down with someone and get this covered as I am running out of time.

Thanks for your help and patience.
 
  • #51
John54321 said:
So N-m being the denominator makes it be multiplied to N-M^2 end up as the numerator.

Sorry I don't get this ? maybe I need to sit down with someone and get this covered as I am running out of time.

Thanks for your help and patience.

If you start with ##\frac{10^3 N⋅m}{10^6\frac{N}{m^2}}##, then you get ##\frac{10^3 N⋅m}{10^6}⋅\frac{m^2}{N}## . Can you carry it the rest of the way, now?
 
  • #52
So what your saying is the units just change over ie n-m = m-n
 
  • #53
John54321 said:
So what your saying is the units just change over ie n-m = m-n
It's not clear what you mean here.

Newtons multiplied by meters (N-m) is the same as meters multiplied by Newtons (m-N). That's the same as saying a * b = b * a.

And it's also not the point of writing ##\frac{10^3 N⋅m}{10^6}⋅\frac{m^2}{N}##

If you simplify the indicated multiplication, you'll see that the Newtons cancel entirely.

John54321 said:
Sorry I don't get this ? maybe I need to sit down with someone and get this covered as I am running out of time.

Thanks for your help and patience.

This may be a better use of your time. You have much remedial work in basic arithmetic and algebra which you need to catch up on. I'm not sure that studying beam problems is going to provide this catch up work, and the work will only get harder.

We are constrained by the rules of PF as to how much help we can give posters, and PF is not an efficient way to teach someone the basics of what they need to know.
 
  • #54
Hi steamking

If it's against Pf forum rules you can email me its vinto2@aol.com thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
88K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K