How to calculate the Bremsstrahlung Background?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nubski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bremsstrahlung
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the Bremsstrahlung background for Transmission Electron Microscopy Energy Dispersive X-ray (TEM EDX) spectra. The original poster mentions the Kramers/Small formula, which exhibits a 1/E dependency that becomes problematic near zero energy. The inquiry specifically targets the Oxygen peak in the spectra, seeking alternative methods or references for accurate background calculation. Ultimately, the poster indicates that the issue has been resolved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bremsstrahlung radiation principles
  • Familiarity with Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) techniques
  • Knowledge of Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) analysis
  • Basic grasp of spectral analysis and background subtraction methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research alternative formulas for Bremsstrahlung background calculation in TEM EDX
  • Explore advanced techniques for background subtraction in EDX spectra
  • Study the impact of energy resolution on EDX peak analysis
  • Review relevant academic papers on Bremsstrahlung effects in electron microscopy
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in materials science, physicists working with electron microscopy, and analysts interpreting EDX spectra who require accurate background calculations for element detection.

Nubski
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

first I like to thank you for this nice forum :smile:
I tried the search function and found no answer to my question, so here it is:
How can I calculate the Bremsstrahlungs background for TEM EDX spectras (Intensity vs. Energy)?
I found several formulas, for example the oldest Kramers/Small, but they all have
a 1/E dependecy, which of course go to ∞ approaching 0. But since I am interested in
the Oxygen peak, that doesn´t help much...
If anyone have an idea or can give me some directions (link to a paper maybe?)
I would really appreciate.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nevermind, problem solved :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K