How to calculate the damping factor for a vibrating string?

Click For Summary
Calculating the damping factor for a vibrating guitar string requires understanding the relationship between the string's physical properties and its oscillation behavior in air. The stiffness of the string can be calculated using the formula k = AE/L, where A is the cross-sectional area, E is Young's modulus, and L is the working length. While critical damping can be determined using Cc = 2(km)^(1/2), the actual damping coefficient c cannot be accurately calculated without additional information, such as the tension in the string and the effects of sound wave emission and friction. The discussion suggests modeling local viscous dissipation and estimating acoustic dissipation to gain insights into the damping behavior. Ultimately, precise calculation of the damping coefficient remains challenging due to the lack of published data.
deadstar33
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I'm running a finite element simulation of a vibrating guitar string, but I do not know how to calculate the correct damping factor for the string as it oscillates in air. I don't have information regarding how many times it will oscillate before the oscillation damps out, but I do have all the physical characteristics of the string. It has a young's modulus of 205 GPa, a Poisson's ratio of 0.31, the working length of the string is 0.648m, the mass of the string is 8.445 x 10^-4 kg, the density of the string is 8890kg/m^3, and it has a radius of 0.2159 x 10^-3 m. I converted everything into S.I units for convenience in the calculations.

Using this data, is there any way to calculate the damping coefficient between the string and air? I've done research but all the methods I've seen of calculating this require values that I don't have, such as the damping coefficient, c. Also, it requires the stiffness of the string, k. Are Young's modulus (E) and stiffness (k) the same thing? Am I correct in saying they are the inverse of each other? As in, 1/E = k?

Thanks.

Edit: My mistake, it's k = AE/L. So I have now applied this formula and calculated the stiffness to be 46.3269 x 10^3 N/m. Using this, I have calculated the critical damping coefficient using the formula Cc = 2(km)^1/2, so that Cc = 12.5097. Now I just need to calculate the damping coefficient, c. Am I using the right method?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you don't have enough information to calculate the damping coefficient. The natural frequencies of a string depend on the tension and the mass per unit length (ok, in ideal case). The tension is adjustable (that's how you tune the guitar). Damping of string oscillations is the result of two processes: emission of sound waves (that take the energy out of the string) and friction (which converts energy into heat). The friction is just viscosity of the string but presume the viscosity of the guitar body would also play a role. There is no published data that would let you calculate the damping coefficient (at one point I was looking for that, didn't find anything).
 
Here's my advice:
(i) Model the local viscous dissipation of the string using two-dimensional Stokesian (non-inertial) flow around a disk.
(ii) If you have one, estimate the total acoustic dissipation from a dB-reader placed near the string (where cylindrical symmetry is strongest.)
Compare the two estimates.
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
839
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
987
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K