How to calculate the integral of exp(-ikt) from -infinity to zero

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhilandSci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral $$f(k) = \int_{-\infty}^0 e^{-i k t} dt$$ can be calculated using complex analysis techniques. The solution is confirmed to be $$f(k) = \frac{i}{k} + \pi \delta(k)$$. To derive this, one should perform a substitution of $$k \rightarrow k + i\epsilon$$ and change variables to $$x = -t$$, which allows for the application of integration by parts. This method leads to a manageable form that ultimately reveals the desired result after careful limit evaluation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Integration techniques, specifically integration by parts
  • Understanding of the Dirac delta function
  • Knowledge of contour integration methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Study complex analysis theorems relevant to contour integration
  • Practice integration by parts with complex exponentials
  • Explore the properties and applications of the Dirac delta function
  • Learn about the implications of the substitution method in integral calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, physicists, and engineers who are working with Fourier transforms and complex integrals.

PhilandSci
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi everyone. I am trying to calculate $$f(k) = \int_{-\infty}^0 e^{-i k t} dt.$$

Homework Equations



Of course we know that $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-i k t} dt = 2 \pi \delta(k)$$ and in fact (I think) I know that the answer to my question must be $$f(k) = \frac{i}{k} + \pi \delta(k).$$ But I am puzzled as to how exactly one can show that this is the answer.

The Attempt at a Solution



I assume we need to make a substitution $$t \rightarrow t + i\epsilon,$$ use complex analysis, and eventually let $$\epsilon \rightarrow 0.$$ But how exactly do we do that? What theorem in complex analysis do we use and what would the result be before epsilon is set to zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a nice but sort of tough question. Here are some hints for you.

First, doing t→t+iε doesn't seem to lead anywhere very helpful. However, you should try k→k+iε. To make it look nicer I changed variables to x=-t. You can factor the exponential in the integrand into two terms, one like eikx and another term like e-εx. Now try doing integration by parts. As with other trigonometric integrals, when you change it into the form uv-∫vdu, it turns out that second integral is related to the integral you want. You need to do a little algebra and be careful about taking limits, and you should get an answer similar to (but not exactly) what you guessed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K