How to calculate the solid angle of a cone with cone axis arbitrary?

Click For Summary
To calculate the solid angle of a cone with an arbitrary axis, spherical coordinates can be used if the cone's central axis is aligned with the z-axis. However, if the axis is horizontal, such as along the y-axis, it is recommended to switch to a different coordinate system to simplify the integration process. The discussion highlights that spherical coordinates are most effective for shapes symmetric about the z-axis, while other orientations may complicate calculations. Redefining the coordinate system to match the symmetry of the shape can facilitate easier integration. Ultimately, adapting the coordinate system is essential for accurately calculating the solid angle in such cases.
soljiang
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I read that if the cone with apex angle 2α whose central axis is vertical, apex at the origin, then one can use spherical coordinate to calculate the solid angle of the cone

02∏0αsin\varphid\thetad\varphi

However, what if the central axis is align to y-axis horizontally, instead of z-axis.
My question is with angle 2α, if the central axis goes through (θ0, \varphi0), then how to set the intragation boundaries? It should give the same answer but I need to now how to set up the equation. Can one still use spherical coordinate?

Thank you so much if I get some help.


Charles
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would simply choose a different coordinate system, to have the same orientation (but in the new system) again. No need to make it more complicated than necessary.
 
So does it mean spherical coordinate is only useful for calculating shapes/surface that's axially symmetric about z axis but not about x or y axis?
 
If something is symmetric around a different axis, I would choose a different coordinate system - a symmetry around the z-axis (which you can define as you like) is easier to handle in spherical coordinates.
 
Hi, mfb, so it's true that if a shape is only symmetric about x or y axis, it's not easy to integrate the surface area using spherical coordinate, unless one redefine the orientation of coordinate. Is that correct? Thank you.
 
That depends on your definition of easy, but it is certainly easier with a different coordinate system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
28K