How to Calculate Torque from Desired Acceleration in a Powertrain Model?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating torque in a vehicle powertrain model based on desired acceleration and tractive forces. The key equation presented is Torque [wheels] = F tractive * dynamic wheel radius, where F tractive is defined as the sum of air resistance, rolling resistance, and acceleration force. The participants emphasize the importance of using numerical methods for dynamic simulations, suggesting a timestep of 0.1s or smaller for accurate results. Additionally, the concept of 'equivalent mass' is introduced to account for rotational inertia in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics equations related to force and torque
  • Familiarity with vehicle dynamics and powertrain concepts
  • Knowledge of numerical methods for simulation, including iteration techniques
  • Experience with calculating forces such as air resistance and rolling resistance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of 'equivalent mass' theory in vehicle dynamics
  • Learn about numerical integration techniques for dynamic simulations
  • Explore methods for calculating air resistance, including drag coefficients
  • Investigate the impact of driveline dynamics on vehicle performance calculations
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, vehicle dynamics researchers, and simulation developers interested in accurately modeling powertrain performance and torque calculations.

Vivek Vijay
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I would like to know the basic eqns in a simple Powertrain model. Where i have the Desired accelaration and the other quantities to calculate the tractive force.

But i need to calculate the torque to the wheels. can anyone help me ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have a look at the units:

[ Nm ] = [ N ] * [ m ]

Torque = Force * radius
 
Hesch said:
Have a look at the units:

[ Nm ] = [ N ] * [ m ]

Torque = Force * radius

Yeah, perhaps my question was too short.

I want to calculate the drive torque to the wheels, taking into consideration of the tractive forces.

Torque [wheels] = F tractive * dynamic wheel radius

F tractive = F air + D drag + F accel

But will this be dynamic enough ?
 
Vivek Vijay said:
F tractive = F air + D drag + F accel
How will you calculate Fair? Read the weather forecast, wind direction, will it rain? Will you calculate the cw-value for each wagon with its load?

Drag is not constant. It goes uphill/downhill.

Vivek Vijay said:
But will this be dynamic enough ?
You are the one to know.

If an exact time of arrival is important, I would install a speed/acceleration control in the train, increasing the turbo pressure if needed.
 
Nice pun ! But you are mistaken - I am not looking to calculate for a power TRAIN, but i am talking about vehicle powertrain (automobile)...

Sorry for the typo...
But what i meant is air resistance (drag). Let me rephrase it..
F tractive = F air resistance + F rolling resistance + F accelaration
=0.5*(air density*drag co-eff*cross sec area*(velocity)^2) + m*g*coeff-roll resistace + (m*desired accel)

In this case i take air density constant - 1.2 kg/m3
Cross sec area - i have example data for the vehicle
 
Vivek Vijay said:
But will this be dynamic enough ?

What do you mean by dynamic?

If you want to calculate Force/Power at a given instant in time your equation is ok.
If you wish to plot Force/power over a given time period for a constant acceleration value, you need to either use 'dt' or do the calculation numerically (iteration per iteration).
 
strive said:
If you want to calculate Force/Power at a given instant in time your equation is ok.
If you wish to plot Force/power over a given time period for a constant acceleration value, you need to either use 'dt' or do the calculation numerically (iteration per iteration).
Yes , i am doing a simulation of my mathematical model therefore numerical calculation by iteration is dynamic .

My question of dynamics was that, i try to make a simple physical equation of powertrain using the formula i mentioned above. When i do that, without considering driveline dynamic is that a right approach.

Or is my question too vague to comprehend ? please let me know
 
Well, i am missing some data in your explanation, but if you don't like sharing the details, that's allright. We'll find a way around it.

What do you mean with 'driveline dynamic'?

If you are worried about using your non-dt formula, don't worry, just use a sufficiently small timestep in your iteration. 0.1s should do, but if you are using a computer to churn out the results you might as well go with 0.01s. Difference will be minimal though.

What order of accuracy are you looking for?
 
I use a mass factor to model the rotational inertia like shown here (I think that is what you are talking about). Learn more about the 'equivalent mass' theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K