How to Calculate Velocity of a Rocket Sled After Passing Over a Rough Patch

  • Thread starter Thread starter xavior6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grade 11 Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the final velocity of a rocket sled after it passes over a rough patch that introduces friction. The sled initially moves at 24 m/s on ice with negligible friction, but encounters a friction force of 6000N when it hits the rough patch, which is 22m long. The sled's weight is given as 20000N.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial velocity and the forces acting on the sled, particularly the friction force. There is a focus on understanding the net force and how it relates to acceleration. Some participants express confusion about the concept of a forward force and its role in the sled's motion.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing insights into the forces involved and clarifying misconceptions about the need for a forward force. There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations, with one participant questioning the accuracy of their results and seeking guidance on potential errors.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of Newton's laws and the effects of friction on motion. There is a noted discrepancy in the expected final velocity, prompting further investigation into the calculations and assumptions made.

xavior6
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Rocket Sled weighing 20000N is gliding at 24 m/s (North) on ice where friction is negligible. Suddenly it passes over a rough patch 22m long, which creates a friction force of 6000N (south). With what velocity does the sled leave the rough patch?


Homework Equations


Vi=Vf+ad
Vf(squared)=Vi(squared)+2ad
Fnet=Ff+Fa
Fnet= Ma


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured that the Vi of the sled when it hits the patch is 24 m/s since there is no acceleration. When it hits the patch, there are two forces on the object; one with -6000N and the other which is the original force applied. The sum of these constitutes the net force. The net force is also equal to the Mass of the object x Acceleration. The mass is 20000/9.81 which equals roughly 2038.7KG.

If I find acceleration, I would easily find the Vf of the object leaving the rough patch. The problem is, I have no idea how to find the forward force of the rocket sled, so I am left with 2 variables in 1 equation and I am stuck.

Can someone please tell me the way to solve this? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xavior6 said:
I figured that the Vi of the sled when it hits the patch is 24 m/s since there is no acceleration. When it hits the patch, there are two forces on the object; one with -6000N and the other which is the original force applied.
There's only one horizontal force acting on the sled--the friction. There's no "original force" needed to keep the sled moving as it glides over the ice.


The sum of these constitutes the net force. The net force is also equal to the Mass of the object x Acceleration. The mass is 20000/9.81 which equals roughly 2038.7KG.

If I find acceleration, I would easily find the Vf of the object leaving the rough patch. The problem is, I have no idea how to find the forward force of the rocket sled, so I am left with 2 variables in 1 equation and I am stuck.
There is no forward force, just friction. Perhaps you are thinking of the force that was needed to get the sled moving at 24 m/s? Once it got moving, no force is needed to keep going. (Newton's 1st law.)
 
Hmm what you say makes complete sense. But i still do not reach the correct answer. Using your advice, the modified solution method would be:

Fnet= -6000N
Fnet= 2038.7Kg(a)
a= -2.94.

Solving this using the Vf(squared)=Vi(squared)+2(a)(d) formula, Vf= 22.6 m/s
The answer is 23.7 m/s, so I am off by a factor of 1.1. Can you point me to the right direction as to what may have caused this deviation? I'm quite sure it can't be rounding errors.
 
Your method is perfectly correct. (I'd say that your answer is a bit too high--recheck your arithmetic!) No reason to think that 23.7 m/s is correct. (Also, realistically speaking, only 2 digits--at most--are significant.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K