How to compute a mean square average

Click For Summary
To compute the mean square average of the expression ##<(x_3 - x_1)^2>##, the key is recognizing that the cross terms, such as ##<x_1 x_2>## and ##<x_2 x_3>##, can be zero. By expanding the equations for ##<(x_1 - x_2)^2>## and ##<(x_2 - x_3)^2>##, one can combine them to isolate ##<(x_3 - x_1)^2>##. The final expression simplifies to show that the differences between the squares of the variables lead to the desired result. The calculations confirm that the approach is valid, assuming the cross products are indeed zero.
JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156

Homework Statement



We know that

$$< (x_1 - x_2)^2 > = \frac{K_bT}{K}$$

$$< (x_2 - x_3)^2 > = \frac{K_bT}{\gamma}$$

What's ##< (x_3 - x_1)^2 >## equal to?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried: ##< (x_2 - x_3)^2 > - < (x_1 - x_2)^2 >## but did not get ##< (x_3 - x_1)^2 >##

How can I get it?

Thanks
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##<(x_1 - x_2)^2> = <x_1^2 - 2x_1x_2 + x_2^2 > = <x_1^2> - 2<x_1 x_2> + <x_2^2>## and similarly for ##<(x_3 - x_1)^2>## and ##<(x_2 - x_3)^2>##.

That should give you a clue on how to combine them to get your desired result, but you need to know something about the cross terms like ##<x_1 x_2>##. You didn't tell us what these variables are, but information you have on them will probably tell you what those terms are (perhaps 0).

I'm just guessing here. I don't know what it is you're trying to get or what you've tried and why you didn't get the desired result. Perhaps show your work so far?
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
RPinPA said:
##<(x_1 - x_2)^2> = <x_1^2 - 2x_1x_2 + x_2^2 > = <x_1^2> - 2<x_1 x_2> + <x_2^2>## and similarly for ##<(x_3 - x_1)^2>## and ##<(x_2 - x_3)^2>##.

That should give you a clue on how to combine them to get your desired result, but you need to know something about the cross terms like ##<x_1 x_2>##. You didn't tell us what these variables are, but information you have on them will probably tell you what those terms are (perhaps 0).

I'm just guessing here. I don't know what it is you're trying to get or what you've tried and why you didn't get the desired result. Perhaps show your work so far?

Yes thanks I think I got it. The key is that the cross products are zero. I expanded both and did ##< (x_2 - x_3)^2 > - < (x_1 - x_2)^2 >##

$$<(x_1 - x_2)^2> = <x_1^2 - 2x_1x_2 + x_2^2 > = <x_1^2> - 2<x_1 x_2> + <x_2^2>$$

$$<(x_2 - x_3)^2> = <x_2^2 - 2x_2x_3 + x_3^2 > = <x_2^2> - 2<x_2 x_3> + <x_3^2>$$

$$< (x_2 - x_3)^2 > - < (x_1 - x_2)^2 > = <x_3^2> - 2<x_2 x_3> + 2<x_1 x_2> - <x_1^2> = <x_3^2> - <x_1^2> = < (x_3 - x_1)^2 >$$

I think it is OK but please let me know if you agree.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K