How to compute this line integral

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the line integral \(\int^{}_C |y| \,ds\) where \(C\) is defined by the curve \((x^2+y^2)^2=r^2(x^2-y^2)\). Participants explore parametrization techniques and the nature of the curve, considering different coordinate systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests changing to polar coordinates, assuming \(r\) is a fixed constant, and proposes that the path may be a straight line.
  • Another participant agrees with the use of polar coordinates but points out that if \(a^2 < 1\), the curve does not exist, while \(a^2 \ge 1\) leads to a straight line through the origin.
  • A later reply challenges the initial derivation, indicating that the equation was misinterpreted and that the actual curve in polar coordinates is more complex, given by \(r^4 = a^2 r^2 \cos(2\theta)\).
  • Participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the parametrization and the implications of the derived equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the nature of the curve or the correct parametrization. There are competing views regarding the implications of the derived equations and the validity of earlier claims.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the fixed nature of \(r\) and the implications of the derived equations on the curve's shape. The discussion reflects a dependency on the interpretation of the original equation and the transformations applied.

jakey
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, can anyone help me with evaluating this:
\int^{}_C |y| \,ds where C is the curve (x^2+y^2)^2=r^2(x^2-y^2)

any hints with the parametrization?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are we to take it that r is some fixed constant? I'm going to call it "a" because I want to change to polar coordinates.

Would you believe the path is a straight line?

With x= r \cos(\theta) and y= r \sin(\theta), the equation of the curve becomes r^2= a^2(r^2 cos(2\theta)) or \cos(2\theta)= 1/a^2.

If a^2&lt; 1, then that is impossible- there is no such curve. If a^2\ge 1, that is a straight line through the origin making angle \theta= (1/2)cos^{-1}(1/a^2). In particular, for a= 1, the graph is the x-axis.

More generally, from
tan(\theta/2)= \sqrt{\frac{1- cos(\theta)}{1+ cos(\theta)}}
with cos(2\theta)= 1/a^2

tan(\theta)= \sqrt{\frac{1- \frac{1}{a^2}}{1+ \frac{1}{a^2}}}= \sqrt{\frac{a^2- 1}{a^2+ 1}}

So the path is a straight line, through the origin, with slope
\sqrt{\frac{a^2- 1}{a^2+ 1}}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Are we to take it that r is some fixed constant? I'm going to call it "a" because I want to change to polar coordinates.

Would you believe the path is a straight line?

With x= r \cos(\theta) and y= r \sin(\theta), the equation of the curve becomes r^2= a^2(r^2 cos(2\theta)) or \cos(2\theta)= 1/a^2.

If a^2&lt; 1, then that is impossible- there is no such curve. If a^2\ge 1, that is a straight line through the origin making angle \theta= (1/2)cos^{-1}(1/a^2). In particular, for a= 1, the graph is the x-axis.

More generally, from
tan(\theta/2)= \sqrt{\frac{1- cos(\theta)}{1+ cos(\theta)}}
with cos(2\theta)= 1/a^2

tan(\theta)= \sqrt{\frac{1- \frac{1}{a^2}}{1+ \frac{1}{a^2}}}= \sqrt{\frac{a^2- 1}{a^2+ 1}}

So the path is a straight line, through the origin, with slope
\sqrt{\frac{a^2- 1}{a^2+ 1}}.

Hi hallsofivy, thanks for the reply.

but it seems that substituting x=t and y = t\sqrt{\frac{a^2-1}{a^2+1}} doesn't satisfy the curve above...
 
jakey said:
Hi hallsofivy, thanks for the reply.

but it seems that substituting x=t and y = t\sqrt{\frac{a^2-1}{a^2+1}} doesn't satisfy the curve above...

The problem is the line in HallsofIvy's derivation below:
HallsofIvy said:
With x= r \cos(\theta) and y= r \sin(\theta), the equation of the curve becomes r^2= a^2(r^2 cos(2\theta))

HallsofIvy accidentally missed that the right hand side was raised to another power of two, meaning the actual curve in polar coordinates is paramatrized by

r^4 = a^2 r^2 \cos(2\theta)
or
r^2= a^2 \cos(2\theta)

The curve is thus not as pleasent as a simple straight line through the origin.
 
Ah, well, if only life were so simple. I knew it was too good to be true! Thanks for the correction, Mute.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K