How to Derive the Shapiro Time Delay?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Shapiro time delay from equation 6.26 to equation 6.30 using the integral t=\int_{r_1}^{r}(1+\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{b^2V(r)}{2}+\frac{Mb^2V(r)}{r})dr. Participants highlight the misleading nature of equation 6.26, which omits terms linear in M that are present in equation 6.25. The correct approach involves simplifying the argument of the square root in equation 6.24 before expansion, ensuring that the terms are accurately accounted for to achieve the desired result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and gravitational time delay concepts.
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and techniques for evaluating integrals.
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansion and its application in physics.
  • Proficiency in manipulating algebraic expressions involving variables and constants.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Shapiro time delay in detail, focusing on equations 6.24 to 6.30.
  • Learn about Taylor series expansion and its application in approximating functions in physics.
  • Explore the implications of terms linear in M in gravitational equations and their physical significance.
  • Review integral calculus techniques specifically for evaluating complex integrals in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity, gravitational physics, and mathematical methods in physics.

stephen cripps
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The step I am trying to follow is detailed here where I am trying to get from equation 6.26:
t=\int_{r_1}^{r}(1+\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{b^2V(r)}{2}+\frac{Mb^2V(r)}{r})dr
to equation 6.30
t=\sqrt{r^2-r_1^2}+2Mln(\frac{r+\sqrt{r^2-r_1^2}}{r_1})+M(\frac{r-r_1}{r+r_1})^{1/2}

Homework Equations


V(r)=r^{-2}(1-\frac{2M}{r})
b=r_z(1-\frac{2M}{r_1})^{-1/2}\approx r_1(1+M/r_1)

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried simplifying the equation by subbing in V, however my integral:
t=\int_{r_1}^{r}(1+\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{b^2}{2})(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{2M}{r^4})dr
seems to get nowhere near the required answer when integrated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equation 6.26 in the link is misleading. It seems to imply that all of the terms that are linear in ##M## have been written out explicitly. But if you look at 6.25 there are terms of the form ##b^4V_{eff}^2##, ##b^6V_{eff}^3##, and so on that each contribute terms linear in ##M##. So, 6.25 generates an infinite number of terms that are linear in ##M##. Not a good way to go!

Try going back to 6.24 and don't expand the square root factor until you first simplify the argument of the square root to first order in ##M##.
 
Hi, thanks for you reply
Sorry I made a mistake in my first statement, where I put my integral in section 3 tit should show t=\int_{r_1}^r(1+\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{b^2}{2}[\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{4M^2}{r^4}])dr

Referring back to your solution though, is the argument not already in first order of M before it is expanded, just in a different form?
 
stephen cripps said:
Referring back to your solution though, is the argument not already in first order of M before it is expanded, just in a different form?
Consider the term ##\frac{3}{8}b^4V_{eff}^2## that occurs in 6.25 but is not written out in 6.26. If you use the expressions for ##b## and ##V_{eff}## in terms of ##M## and expand ##\frac{3}{8}b^4V_{eff}^2##, you will see that you get a term independent of ##M##, a term linear in ##M##, as well as terms of higher order in ##M##.
 
So starting from 6.24, by bringing the b inside the square root, I can replace (1-b^2V(r))^{1/2} With (1-\frac{r_1^2}{r^2}(1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{2M}{r_1}))^{1/2}. Ignoring higher orders of M. Expanding this again however doesn't seem to get me near the right answer.
 
stephen cripps said:
So starting from 6.24, by bringing the b inside the square root, I can replace (1-b^2V(r))^{1/2} With (1-\frac{r_1^2}{r^2}(1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{2M}{r_1}))^{1/2}. Ignoring higher orders of M. Expanding this again however doesn't seem to get me near the right answer.
Your expression looks correct. It works out for me. Could you show the next few steps of how you expanded the square root to first order in M?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K