How to Derive the Shapiro Time Delay?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the Shapiro time delay from a specific integral equation related to gravitational effects in general relativity. Participants are examining the transition between two equations, focusing on the manipulation of terms involving mass and potential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to simplify an integral by substituting expressions for potential and mass, while questioning the completeness of the terms in the equations provided. There is a focus on whether certain terms have been omitted or misrepresented in the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts at simplification and expressing confusion over the implications of certain terms. Some guidance has been offered regarding the order of expansion and the treatment of terms, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of specific equations from a text, with an emphasis on maintaining accuracy in the treatment of terms related to mass and potential. There are indications that higher-order terms may complicate the derivation process.

stephen cripps
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The step I am trying to follow is detailed here where I am trying to get from equation 6.26:
[tex]t=\int_{r_1}^{r}(1+\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{b^2V(r)}{2}+\frac{Mb^2V(r)}{r})dr[/tex]
to equation 6.30
[tex]t=\sqrt{r^2-r_1^2}+2Mln(\frac{r+\sqrt{r^2-r_1^2}}{r_1})+M(\frac{r-r_1}{r+r_1})^{1/2}[/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex]V(r)=r^{-2}(1-\frac{2M}{r})[/tex]
[tex]b=r_z(1-\frac{2M}{r_1})^{-1/2}\approx r_1(1+M/r_1)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried simplifying the equation by subbing in V, however my integral:
[tex]t=\int_{r_1}^{r}(1+\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{b^2}{2})(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{2M}{r^4})dr[/tex]
seems to get nowhere near the required answer when integrated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equation 6.26 in the link is misleading. It seems to imply that all of the terms that are linear in ##M## have been written out explicitly. But if you look at 6.25 there are terms of the form ##b^4V_{eff}^2##, ##b^6V_{eff}^3##, and so on that each contribute terms linear in ##M##. So, 6.25 generates an infinite number of terms that are linear in ##M##. Not a good way to go!

Try going back to 6.24 and don't expand the square root factor until you first simplify the argument of the square root to first order in ##M##.
 
Hi, thanks for you reply
Sorry I made a mistake in my first statement, where I put my integral in section 3 tit should show [tex]t=\int_{r_1}^r(1+\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{b^2}{2}[\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{4M^2}{r^4}])dr[/tex]

Referring back to your solution though, is the argument not already in first order of M before it is expanded, just in a different form?
 
stephen cripps said:
Referring back to your solution though, is the argument not already in first order of M before it is expanded, just in a different form?
Consider the term ##\frac{3}{8}b^4V_{eff}^2## that occurs in 6.25 but is not written out in 6.26. If you use the expressions for ##b## and ##V_{eff}## in terms of ##M## and expand ##\frac{3}{8}b^4V_{eff}^2##, you will see that you get a term independent of ##M##, a term linear in ##M##, as well as terms of higher order in ##M##.
 
So starting from 6.24, by bringing the b inside the square root, I can replace [tex](1-b^2V(r))^{1/2}[/tex] With [tex](1-\frac{r_1^2}{r^2}(1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{2M}{r_1}))^{1/2}[/tex]. Ignoring higher orders of M. Expanding this again however doesn't seem to get me near the right answer.
 
stephen cripps said:
So starting from 6.24, by bringing the b inside the square root, I can replace [tex](1-b^2V(r))^{1/2}[/tex] With [tex](1-\frac{r_1^2}{r^2}(1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{2M}{r_1}))^{1/2}[/tex]. Ignoring higher orders of M. Expanding this again however doesn't seem to get me near the right answer.
Your expression looks correct. It works out for me. Could you show the next few steps of how you expanded the square root to first order in M?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K