How to Derive the Solvability Condition for a Biological Matrix?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the solvability condition for the biological matrix \( A_{\lambda} \), defined by specific parameters including \(\tau\), \(\mu\), \(D\), \(\alpha\), \(s\), and \(\beta\). The determinant of the matrix is established as a polynomial equation that must equal zero for the matrix to be singular. The associated polynomial is expressed as \( a(k^2)\lambda^2 + b(k^2)\lambda + c(k^2) = 0 \), with defined coefficients \( a(k^2) = \mu k^2 \), \( b(k^2) = (\beta + \mu D)k^4 - (2\tau - 1)k^2 s \), and \( c(k^2) = \beta Dk^6 - \{(\alpha + D)\tau - D\}k^4 + sDk^2 \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix theory and determinants
  • Familiarity with polynomial equations and their roots
  • Knowledge of biological parameters affecting matrix solvability
  • Basic grasp of complex numbers, particularly the imaginary unit \( i \)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of singular matrices in biological modeling
  • Explore the derivation of polynomial roots using numerical methods
  • Investigate the role of complex parameters in matrix equations
  • Learn about the application of matrix theory in biological systems
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in mathematical biology, mathematicians focusing on matrix theory, and anyone involved in modeling biological systems using differential equations.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
$$
A_{\lambda}=
\begin{pmatrix}
-\mu\lambda k^2 - k^2 - s & i\tau k & i\tau k - i\beta k^3\\
i\lambda k & \lambda + Dk^2 & -\alpha k^2\\
i\lambda k & 0 & \lambda
\end{pmatrix}
$$

where $\lambda = \lambda(k^2)$ (this is confusing) is the growth rate and k is the wave number, and tau, mu, D, alpha, s, and beta are biological parameters. The solvability condition for a matrix $A_{\lambda}$ requires that the matrix is singular.

So the I found the determinant to be $-Dk^4\lambda -Dik^2\lambda -Dk^2s\lambda +Di^2k^6\beta\lambda -k^2\lambda^2-ik^2\lambda^2-s\lambda^2+i^2k^4\beta\lambda^2-Dk^4\lambda^2\mu-k^2\lambda^3\mu-Di^2k^3\lambda\tau-i^2k^4\alpha\lambda\tau-i^2k\lambda^2\tau-i^2k^2\lambda^2\tau=0$
for it to be singular.

Then it says show that the polynomial associated with the solvability condition is given by
$$
a(k^2)\lambda^2 + b(k^2)\lambda +c(k^2) =0
$$
where
\begin{align}
a(k^2)=& \mu k^2\\
b(k^2)=& (\beta+\mu D)k^4 - (2\tau-1)k^2 s\\
c(k^2)=& \beta Dk^6-\{(\alpha+D)\tau-D\}k^4+sDk^2
\end{align}

From what I have, I can obtain that. I am not sure if i is the imaginary constant or just some constant i.
Even if i is the imaginary constant, we would still have some i's.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
$$
A_{\lambda}=
\begin{pmatrix}
-\mu\lambda k^2 - k^2 - s & i\tau k & i\tau k - i\beta k^3\\
i\lambda k & \lambda + Dk^2 & -\alpha k^2\\
i\lambda k & 0 & \lambda
\end{pmatrix}
$$

where $\lambda = \lambda(k^2)$ (this is confusing because that is just 1 = k^2) is the growth rate and k is the wave number, and tau, mu, D, alpha, s, and beta are biological parameters. The solvability condition for a matrix $A_{\lambda}$ requires that the matrix is singular.

So the I found the determinant to be
$-Dk^4\lambda -Dik^2\lambda -Dk^2s\lambda +Di^2k^6\beta\lambda -k^2\lambda^2$
$-ik^2\lambda^2-s\lambda^2+i^2k^4\beta\lambda^2-Dk^4\lambda^2\mu-k^2\lambda^3\mu-Di^2k^3\lambda\tau-i^2k^4\alpha\lambda\tau-i^2k\lambda^2\tau-i^2k^2\lambda^2\tau=0$
for it to be singular.

Then it says show that the polynomial associated with the solvability condition is given by
$$
a(k^2)\lambda^2 + b(k^2)\lambda +c(k^2) =0
$$
where
\begin{align}
a(k^2)=& \mu k^2\\
b(k^2)=& (\beta+\mu D)k^4 - (2\tau-1)k^2 s\\
c(k^2)=& \beta Dk^6-\{(\alpha+D)\tau-D\}k^4+sDk^2
\end{align}

From what I have, I can't obtain that. I am not sure if i is the imaginary constant or just some constant i.
Even if i is the imaginary constant, we would still have some i's left after simplifying.

Typo in the original question. Also, fixed the equation from going of the screen.
 
Last edited:
​Solved
 
dwsmith said:
​Solved

Do you have the ability to mark threads as solved now, under Thread Tools? It should be there...
 
Ackbach said:
Do you have the ability to mark threads as solved now, under Thread Tools? It should be there...

I don't see it as an option.
 
dwsmith said:
I don't see it as an option.

Oh, silly me. I already marked your thread as Solved. Do you have the "Mark this thread as unsolved" option in your Thread Tools?
 
Ackbach said:
Oh, silly me. I already marked your thread as Solved. Do you have the "Mark this thread as unsolved" option in your Thread Tools?

It doesn't appear for any threads I have. Even if it is marked solved, when the option is there, it then says to mark as unsolved--which is nonexistence to me.

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/89
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K