How to Determine Forces on Ropes in a Suspended L-Shaped Beam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Numeriprimi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the forces acting on ropes supporting a suspended L-shaped beam. The beam is homogeneous, with its longer arm three times the length of the shorter arm, and the problem involves analyzing two different configurations of the beam.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equilibrium of forces and moments, questioning the choice of the axis of rotation and the implications of different configurations. There are attempts to apply the equations for static equilibrium, and some participants explore the geometry involved in calculating distances related to the center of mass.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the calculations needed for determining moments and forces. Some guidance has been offered regarding the center of mass and the application of moments, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the need for specific geometric relationships and the implications of different points of rotation. There is mention of basic formulas and the need for further understanding of the center of mass in the context of the beam's weight.

Numeriprimi
Messages
135
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Homogeneous beam shaped in letter L is suspended on two ropes of the same length l.
The beam is of negligible thickness and its longer arm is three times longer than the shorter arm. Its overall length is l as well as the length of one rope. Look at each situation in the figures. How can I determine the forces acting on the rope at points A and B in both situations?
There is picture on first example: http://fyzikalniolympiada.cz/archiv/55/fo55a1_z.pdf

2. The attempt at a solution
A)
So, I have some equalities...
1) the resultant force is zero
T_1+T_2-F_G = 0
T_1+T_2 = F_G = mg
2) the resultant moment is zero
M_1 + M_2 = 0
... where is the axis of rotation? in C?
and if the axis of rotation in C, where is the arm of forces? (the d from equation M=Fd)
... it is a perpendicular line from C to lengthened shape?
What is different in the second situation? apply the same equation?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Numeriprimi said:
So, I have some equalities...
1) the resultant force is zero
T_1+T_2-F_G = 0
T_1+T_2 = F_G = mg
2) the resultant moment is zero
M_1 + M_2 = 0

Good, so far.

... where is the axis of rotation? in C?

There is no rotation. Any point can be used to compute moments. But because your equation has only the moments of the tension in the ropes, that point must be C (otherwise, you would have the moment of weight).

and if the axis of rotation in C, where is the arm of forces? (the d from equation M=Fd)
... it is a perpendicular line from C to lengthened shape?

It is the distance between the line of force and the line parallel to the force passing through C.

What is different in the second situation? apply the same equation?

Same equation, but note that the line of force is different.
 
Ok, thanks.
AC = 2/3 l; BC = 1/3 l
(AB)^2 = (AC)^2 - (BC)^2 = (2/3 l)^2 - (1/3 l)^2 = 3/9 l^2
AB = √(3/9 l^2) = √3 /3 * l = 1/√3 * l

I'll add a point on pictures
X ... point making right triangle XBC
I can make two equations by Pytgagoras equation.
1) (AB - XC)^2 = AC^2 - AX^2
(1/√3 * l - XC)^2 = (2/3 * l)^2 - AX^2
2) XC^2 = BC^2 - AX^2
XC^2 = (1/3 * l)^2 - AX^2

I have two unknows in the equations... So, I can solve it.
I have to know XC anc AB-XC fordetermining moments.
Than M= T_1*(AB-XC) - T_2*XC
And then I will have some system of equations for determinate T_1 and T_2.
It is true?

However, what with B? Same solution, but no AB-XC an XC, but different progress? So, XC an YC.
 
I misdirected you in my previous post. I said that if you choose C as the point about which the moments of force are computed, then the moment of weight will be zero. That is not correct.

I think it will be better to find the location of the center of mass in both cases then compute moments about this center. Are you familiar with the formula for the moment of force that uses the sine function?
 
Why it isn't correct?
Hmm, no, I know only basic formulas :-(
 
There are three forces: two in the ropes and the weight of the beam.

The weight of the beam acts as if it was applied to the center of mass of the beam. To compute its moment properly, you have to know its center of mass.
 
This is a repost of https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=730319.
Numeriprimi, why didn't you respond to me on that thread? There, I suggested you take moments about one of the points of attachment. For the moment of the beam, you could first find its centre of mass as Voko suggests, but I think you might as well just treat the two arms as separate loads. E.g. consider the section AC. What is its mass? Where is its mass centre? What moment does it have about A?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K