How to determine the base of a Number given a problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dk702
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base
Click For Summary
To determine the base of a number system in problems involving unknown operators, it is essential to test various bases and operations systematically. In the given problem, the base must be at least 5 due to the presence of the digit 4. The discussion suggests that assuming the base as 5 leads to inconsistencies, indicating a possible error in the problem statement. A methodical approach involves rewriting the equations in terms of unknowns and analyzing the relationships between the digits. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the problem may have been copied incorrectly, affecting the ability to find a valid solution.
dk702
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The problem is a follows

142 alpha 214 = 331
and
431 beta 123 = 303

where alpha and beta are unknow operators

I am pretty sure they are +,-,*,/

I know the radix (base) must be 5 or higher because 4 is present

By assuming the base to be 5 and converting to decimal, I discover beta = - and the base is indeed five. But if I convert the first part the first part to decimal useing base 5 the answer is wrong.

It is possible I copied the problem incorrectly

In general, my question is, how to determine the base to a number system given a problem similar to the one above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only way I could think of is to TRY various bases, various operations and SEE which one works. Somethime the best way to solve a problem is actually do all the "donkey work".
 
If you are restricted to just the +/- operations, you can rewrite the problem in term of two unknowns (if alpha, beta are given to be distinct; else three unknowns). Let the base be 'b' :

(2+4b+b^2) + (-1)^n (4+b+2b^2) = 1+3b+3b^2

and (1+3b+4b^2) + (-1)^m (3+2b+b^2) = 3+3b^2~~~n,m ~\epsilon~ {0,1}
 
Last edited:
Here's another thing to notice ...and this, in conjuction with the above type of method, gives you a solution.

<small number> alpha <large number> =<larger number>, all numbers positive

So alpha must be addition or multiplication. But the number of digits of LHS and RHS are the same (three), so it must be addition. By a similar reasoning, beta is subtraction.

Thus, you copied the problem down incorrectly.
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K