How to Determine the Change in Entropy of a Monoatomic Ideal Gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chocolatepie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Entropy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the change in entropy (ΔS) for a monoatomic ideal gas expanding from 0.500L at 298K and 100kPa to 1.00L at 373K. The correct formula for ΔS is derived as ΔS = n C_{v,m} ln(T2/T1) + n R ln(V2/V1), where C_{v,m} = (3/2)R for a monoatomic ideal gas. The participants confirm that the number of moles (n) is 0.02 and the final pressure (P2) is 62 kPa, resulting in ΔS = 0.12 J/K. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the appropriate thermodynamic equations for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ideal gas law (PV=nRT)
  • Knowledge of molar heat capacities (C_{v,m} and C_{p,m}) for monoatomic gases
  • Familiarity with entropy calculations in thermodynamics
  • Ability to perform logarithmic calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the entropy change formula for ideal gases
  • Learn about the equipartition theorem and its application to monoatomic gases
  • Explore the implications of non-constant pressure processes in thermodynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between temperature, volume, and pressure in gas expansions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying thermodynamics, physics enthusiasts, and professionals in engineering fields who require a solid understanding of gas behavior and entropy calculations.

chocolatepie
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A monoatomic ideal gas is initially trapped in a 0.500L container at 298K and 100kPa. The sample is then allowed to expand to 1.00L and the temperature is increased to 373K. Determine change of the entropy (ΔS)

Homework Equations



ΔS = ∫(T1 to T2) dqrev/T

The Attempt at a Solution



Is the pressure constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you for start replying my question. I REALLY appreciate it!
Ok. what I would do is to assume that pressure is constant, so I would use the formula I posted earlier.

C p,m = 3/2R
C p = 3/2R x change in mole (determined by PΔV=ΔnRΔT)
which would give me 0.9989 J/K

Then I would find the change of the entropy by integrating and it gave me:
ΔS = 3/2R (ln373-ln298)
= 2.8 J/K

Yes?
 
Hmm, you've got C p,m wrong (check the table).

I'm afraid there is no change in mole, but you do need to calculate the number of moles.
How did you get that formula?
 
I like Serena said:
Hmm, you've got C p,m wrong (check the table).

I'm afraid there is no change in mole, but you do need to calculate the number of moles.
How did you get that formula?


Uh.. I wrote 3/2R because I was using the equipartition theorem. Since the monoatomic ideal gas does not have neither rotational nor transitional energy, 3/2RT. Then I sub this into heat capacity formula where T would get cancelled.

I am not even sure if I am doing this question right.. confused..
 
chocolatepie said:
Uh.. I wrote 3/2R because I was using the equipartition theorem. Since the monoatomic ideal gas does not have neither rotational nor transitional energy, 3/2RT. Then I sub this into heat capacity formula where T would get cancelled.

I am not even sure if I am doing this question right.. confused..

Oh, you're doing the question right.
There's just some minor stuff to take care of...

Let's start with the proper relevant formulas, which you seem to have left out.

You should have:
1. PV=nRT for an ideal gas.
2. Cv,m = (3/2)R for a monatomic ideal gas (molar heat capacity at constant volume).
3. Cp,m = (5/2)R for a monatomic ideal gas (molar heat capacity at constant pressure).
4. ΔS = Cp,m ln(T2 / T1) for 1 mole of an ideal gas at constant pressure.

See what I mean?
You should be able to find these on the wiki page I mentioned.

From (1) you can calculate the number of moles n...
 
Oh OK. I see what you mean now :redface:

But when determining the number of mole using PV=nRT, how do I know which T or which V I need to use? I have 2 values (for example, V1 and V2, etc). This is actually why I used the change (Δ).
 
Hmm, let's organize this a bit:

Darn! I'm just noticing that the process is probably not at constant pressure!
I'll have to think about that.

\begin{array}{| c | c | c |}<br /> \hline \\<br /> &amp; \textrm{Before (1)} &amp; \textrm{After (2)} \\<br /> \hline \\<br /> V &amp; 0.500 \textrm{ L} &amp; 1.00 \textrm{ L} \\<br /> T &amp; 298 \textrm{ K} &amp; 373 \textrm{ K} \\<br /> P &amp; 100 \textrm{ kPa} &amp; ? \\<br /> n &amp; ? &amp; ? \\<br /> S &amp; S_1 &amp; S_2, \Delta S = ? \\<br /> \hline<br /> \end{array}

Can you fill in the question marks?
 
Last edited:
And I'll bring in a new formula (always true for an ideal gas):

\Delta S = n C_{v,m} \ln{T_2 \over T_1} + n R \ln{V_2 \over V_1}
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
And I'll bring in a new formula (always true for an ideal gas):

\Delta S = n C_{v,m} \ln{T_2 \over T_1} + n R \ln{V_2 \over V_1}



Whoa!
I got:
n= 0.02 for both initial and final
P2 = 62 kPa
ΔS = 0.12 J/K

However, I did not learn that formula.. I've seen the first and second part of the equation separately but not together like that. Shouldn't I use the second part of the equation for the reversible isothermal expansion? This was not isothermal though?
 
  • #11
chocolatepie said:
Whoa!
I got:
n= 0.02 for both initial and final
P2 = 62 kPa
ΔS = 0.12 J/K

Looks good!
chocolatepie said:
However, I did not learn that formula.. I've seen the first and second part of the equation separately but not together like that. Shouldn't I use the second part of the equation for the reversible isothermal expansion? This was not isothermal though?

Ah well, I was looking for a general equation, but couldn't find it quickly enough, so I derived it myself.
It's probably on the internet somewhere.

Here's the derivation if you're interested.

\def\d{\textrm{ d}}
From \d U=T \d S - P \d V (always true!) we find:
\d S = {\d U \over T} + {P \d V \over T}

With U = n C_{v,m} T:
\d S = {n C_{v,m} \d T \over T} + {P \d V \over T}

With P V = n R T we also have {P \over T} = {n R \over V} implying:
\d S = {n C_{v,m} \d T \over T} + {n R \d V \over V}

Integrate, and we get:
\Delta S = n C_{v,m} \ln {T_2 \over T_1} + n R \ln {V_2 \over V_1}
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Thank you so much for your help!

I looked through my notes, and I realized that I actually had that formula LOL.
Anyway, thank you again!

Take care! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K