How to directly calculate the polarizability

  • Thread starter Thread starter sandf
  • Start date Start date
sandf
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Dear all,
I want to directly calculate the polarizability using the following perturbation expression,
when the ground state wave function |0> is known.
for example, for He atom, r1 and r2 two electrons.

##\alpha = \frac{2}{3}\left\langle {0|({r_1} + {r_2})\frac{1}{{H - {E_0}}}({r_1} + {r_2})|0} \right\rangle ##

How to deal with the term of ## \frac{1}{{H - {E_0}}}## ?

Any help or references will be appreciated.

Best regards.
Youzhao Lan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a bit a longer story. First, have a look on time-independent perturbation theory in a good textbook on quantum theory. The treatment in Sakurai is very good. Then look for the application on the Stark effect (2nd order perturbation theory).
 
Thank you very much, I get it.

Best regards.
Lan
 
Usually, you insert a resolution of the identity in terms of eigenfunctions of H, i.e. ## (H-E_0)^{-1}=\sum_i |i\rangle (E_i-E_0)^{-1}\langle i |##.
 
Dear DrDu,
Thank you very much! The infinite summation seems to be another difficult task for obtaining exact results.
Best regards.
Lan
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top