How to evaluate pure Mode-II SIF using Abaqus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sagar Thakre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Abaqus Pure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on evaluating pure Mode-II Stress Intensity Factor (SIF) using Abaqus for an edge normal crack in a plate. Participants explore boundary conditions, element selection, and meshing techniques relevant to finite element analysis in fracture mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports discrepancies between Abaqus results and theoretical SIF for Mode-II and seeks advice on boundary conditions.
  • Another participant suggests that the mismatch may stem from the choice of element or meshing strategy, emphasizing the importance of justifying these selections.
  • A participant mentions successful results for Pure Mode-I SIF using the same plate and element type (2D CPS8R), indicating a potential issue specific to Mode-II analysis.
  • Several participants recommend consulting fracture mechanics literature for insights into modeling challenges near crack tips, providing a link to relevant resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reasons for the discrepancies in SIF results, with no consensus on the specific boundary conditions or modeling techniques that should be employed for Mode-II analysis.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of modeling crack behavior and the need for careful selection of elements and meshing techniques, but do not resolve the specific mathematical or technical challenges involved.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and professionals engaged in finite element analysis, particularly those focusing on fracture mechanics and stress intensity factors.

Sagar Thakre
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am trying to evaluate pure Mode-II SIF using Abaqus for edge normal crack in the plate. The solution i am getting using Abaqus is not matching with the theoretical SIF.
The boundary condition i have used is shown in fig attached.
suggest me proper boundary condition to evaluate the SIF.
 

Attachments

  • Boundary condition.JPG
    Boundary condition.JPG
    6 KB · Views: 532
Engineering news on Phys.org
The last time I used Abaqus, it came with a thick book of example problems. I'm sure that at least one of those problems analyzed a crack.

The boundary conditions that you show are quite simple. The crack itself is not so simple. It is likely that your solution not matching is related to your selection of element and/or how you meshed your model.

As a master's student, your task is to figure out how to properly model this problem. You need to select the element, and justify your selection. Then you need to mesh your model properly, and justify that also. And you will need to convince your advisor.
 
jrmichler said:
The last time I used Abaqus, it came with a thick book of example problems. I'm sure that at least one of those problems analyzed a crack.

The boundary conditions that you show are quite simple. The crack itself is not so simple. It is likely that your solution not matching is related to your selection of element and/or how you meshed your model.

As a master's student, your task is to figure out how to properly model this problem. You need to select the element, and justify your selection. Then you need to mesh your model properly, and justify that also. And you will need to convince your advisor.
Thanks for your reply.
I have solved problem for Pure Mode-I on same plate and there is close agreement between theoretical and Abaqus results. I have used 2D CPS8R element in solving this problem.
but it is not working in case of Mode-II SIF.
 
Time to hit the fracture mechanics books. I did a quick search with search terms fracture mode 2 fea, and this popped up: http://www.mate.tue.nl/~piet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsyl1213.pdf. It discusses some of the challenges in modelling near a crack tip, and provides some references that appear to apply to your specific problem. Search forward from those sources, and you should find answers to your case.
 
jrmichler said:
Time to hit the fracture mechanics books. I did a quick search with search terms fracture mode 2 fea, and this popped up: http://www.mate.tue.nl/~piet/edu/frm/pdf/frmsyl1213.pdf. It discusses some of the challenges in modelling near a crack tip, and provides some references that appear to apply to your specific problem. Search forward from those sources, and you should find answers to your case.
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
10K