Fracture Mechanics - Crack Propagation and Stress Intensity Factors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the critical crack length using finite element analysis in ABAQUS, specifically through the evaluation of stress intensity factors (modes I, II, and III) and contour integrals at the crack tip. The user reports that as the crack length increases, the stress intensity factor initially rises but eventually peaks and decreases without exceeding the material's fracture toughness. This behavior raises questions about whether the crack is arresting, the accuracy of the constitutive model, or potential issues within the ABAQUS code. The user emphasizes the necessity of comparing computational results with experimental measurements to validate the findings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite element analysis (FEA) principles
  • Familiarity with ABAQUS software for fracture analysis
  • Knowledge of stress intensity factors and fracture mechanics
  • Experience with material fracture toughness concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate ABAQUS documentation on fracture analysis and stress intensity factors
  • Learn about experimental methods for measuring crack propagation and fracture toughness
  • Explore advanced constitutive models relevant to crack behavior in materials
  • Review case studies on finite element modeling of crack propagation
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and students in materials science, mechanical engineering, and structural analysis who are involved in fracture mechanics and finite element modeling.

UnteljentEnginyr
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to determine the critical crack length of a part using finite element analysis. The software I am using (ABAQUS) has the ability to perform fracture analysis. I model the part, create a crack, and ABAQUS will output the stress intensity factors (modes I, II, and III) and contour integrals in the area of the crack tip.

Theoretically, in order to determine the critical crack length, I would extend the length of my crack to see how it affects the stress intensity factor. Once the stress intensity factor exceeds the fracture toughness of the material, I'd consider that my critical crack length.

However, I never observe the stress intensity factor exceed the fracture toughness. Initially, the stress intensity factor is increasing as I grow the crack. As I continue to grow the crack, the stress intensity factor reaches a peak and then starts to decrease without ever having exceeded the fracture toughness of the material.

Does this indicate that the crack is arresting and there won't be failure due to the crack?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
UnteljentEnginyr said:
I am trying to determine the critical crack length of a part using finite element analysis. The software I am using (ABAQUS) has the ability to perform fracture analysis. I model the part, create a crack, and ABAQUS will output the stress intensity factors (modes I, II, and III) and contour integrals in the area of the crack tip.

Theoretically, in order to determine the critical crack length, I would extend the length of my crack to see how it affects the stress intensity factor. Once the stress intensity factor exceeds the fracture toughness of the material, I'd consider that my critical crack length.

However, I never observe the stress intensity factor exceed the fracture toughness. Initially, the stress intensity factor is increasing as I grow the crack. As I continue to grow the crack, the stress intensity factor reaches a peak and then starts to decrease without ever having exceeded the fracture toughness of the material.

Does this indicate that the crack is arresting and there won't be failure due to the crack?
Or the constitutive model is wrong, or the model for stress intensity factor is incorrect, or ABAQUS code is wrong.

One needs to compare the calculation against a real experimental measurement to see if the local plastic strain is correct, and if crack propagation rates are correct.
 
Yea, I realize a real world test would be the best option at this point. Unfortunately, the people with the money make the calls.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K