How to find a line perpendicular to another line and through a point.

Click For Summary
To find a line perpendicular to a given line and passing through a specified point not on that line, first identify the equation of the given line in parametric form. The perpendicular line can be derived by determining the plane that is orthogonal to the given line and contains the specified point. The equation of this plane can be expressed using the normal vector derived from the coefficients of the given line. Next, find the intersection of the given line with this plane, and the line connecting the intersection point to the specified point is the desired perpendicular line. This approach clarifies the geometric relationship between the lines and the plane, ensuring accurate results.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
i'm given some line and a point (not on that line), and i want to find a line that is perpendicular to given line and passes through the given point.

here is what I've tried so far. please tell me where i went wrong.

given line:

x=at+x0
y=bt+y0
z=ct+z0

given point: P(Px,Py,Pz)

my method is to use coordinate transformation basically. but apparently I've done it incorrectly.

<x0,y0,z0> is the initial point if you will on the line; it is the initial vector we are starting from when @ t=0. but this vector is with respect to some origin. as shown in the picture here.
http://i.imgur.com/dFs5FvQ.png

i wanted to redefine my origin at the point P such that the vector traversing through parameter t would always originate from point P like so
http://i.imgur.com/fvvWpoq.png

(where my starting point on the line ((t=0) is r0)

so to redefine the starting/initial vector..

<x0,y0,z0> - (Px,Py,Pz) would give me \vec{Pr }0

and here's where i think i got it wrong; i figured the following would give me the line's vector component

<a,b,c> - (Px,Py,Pz)my idea was, when find the magnitude of the line's new equation, then take the derivative with respect to t, then set this equal to zero and this would yield the minimum distance from P to some point along the line. but i tried this and the math is not working out where did i go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're making life too difficult. If I want the line to pass through P when t=0, what are x0, y0 and z0? No changing origins or anything.

The values of a,b and c will depend on the line you want to be perpendicular to.
 
well.. all that was to determine a b and c. the idea was to find the orthogonal by minimizing d the distance. any suggestions on how else i could approach the problem?
 
If the problem is to find a line perpendicular to a given line in three dimensions, at a given point on the line there is NO unique solution. At any point on the given line, there exist a plane perpendicular to the given line. Any line on that plane, through the given point, is such a line.

If the problem is to find a line perpendicular to the given line through a given point not on the line then first find the plane perpendicular to the given line containing the given point.

If the given line is x= at+ d, y= bt+ e, z= ct+ f, then any plane perpendicular to that line has equation ax+ by+ cz= D. If the given point is (x_0, y_0, z_0) then we must have ax_0+ by_0+ cz_0= D so the equation of the plane perpendicular to the given plane, containing the given point, is ax+ by+ cz= ax_0+ by_0+ cz_0 or, equivalently, a(x- x_0)+ b(y- y_0)+ c(z- z_0)= 0.

Now find the point where the given line intersects that plane: replace x, y, and z in the equation of the plane with at+ d, bt+ e, and ct+ f, and solve for t. The line through the given point and that point of intersection is the desired perpendicular line.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K