How to Find a Specific Transformation for a Specific Hamiltonian?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cosmossos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformations
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a specific transformation related to a Hamiltonian, particularly in the context of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. The original poster seeks guidance on identifying a generating function for this transformation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the form of the Hamiltonian and the nature of canonical transformations. The original poster questions how to derive a specific transformation for the given Hamiltonian, while others inquire about the characteristics of the Hamiltonian itself.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring the properties of the Hamiltonian and the requirements for a canonical transformation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the canonical nature of the transformation, but no consensus or resolution has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster references a specific homework question and a document link, indicating that there may be constraints or specific requirements outlined in the homework that are relevant to the discussion.

Cosmossos
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question 3b from the following file:
http://phstudy.technion.ac.il/~wn114101/hw/wn2010_hw07.pdf

I know I need to find a generating function for this spacific transformation. but I don't know how to find it, I mean , how I find a spacific transformation for a spacific hamiltonain?
thnaks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what the Hamiltonian of a one dimensional harmonic oscillator looks like?
 
It's the classic expression (H=p^2/2m+kx^2/2)
 
Cosmossos said:
It's the classic expression (H=p^2/2m+kx^2/2)

Right, so (using [itex]P[/itex] and [itex]Q[/itex] instead of 'p' and 'x'), you are looking for a canonical transformation [itex]Q=Q(q,p)[/itex] and [itex]P=P(q,p)[/itex], for which [tex]\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{q^2}+p^2q^4\right)\to \frac{P^2}{2m}+\frac{kQ^2}{2}[/itex] (give or take a constant)...what does the fact that the transformation is canonical tell you?[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K