How to find full width at half max for non-Gaussian peaks.

  • Thread starter Thread starter czechman45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max Width
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on characterizing non-Gaussian peaks in a signal using Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) as a measure. The peaks are described as distinct bumps on a 1/ln(x) curve rather than traditional Gaussian shapes. A suggested method for determining the width of these peaks involves calculating the curvature, specifically the second derivative, at the peak's tip. This approach is recommended when a fitting function for the background width is not available.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) measurement
  • Knowledge of signal processing techniques
  • Familiarity with derivatives and curvature in mathematical analysis
  • Experience with data analysis tools for peak characterization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating curvature in signal processing
  • Explore techniques for fitting background functions to non-Gaussian data
  • Learn about advanced peak detection algorithms in data analysis
  • Investigate software tools for signal analysis, such as MATLAB or Python libraries
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for data analysts, signal processing engineers, and researchers working with non-Gaussian data who need to accurately characterize peak properties in their signals.

czechman45
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have a signal that has several distinct peaks. I need to characterize these peaks by their max y value, their x location, and their width. I thought FWHM would be a good measure. However, these peaks are just from a data logger. They are pretty Gaussian curves. Furthermore, the curve doesn't go to zero in between peaks. The peaks are more of like distinct bumps on a 1/ln(x) curve. Any idea on how characterize the width of these peaks?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you don't have a function that you can fit the background width (which would be better), and if the peaks all have qualitatively the same shape, then you could try calculating the curvature (second derivative) at the tip of the peak.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
70K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K